1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horrorfan [7]
3 years ago
10

Dexter Industries purchased packaging equipment on January 8 for $116,600. The equipment was expected to have a useful life of t

hree years, or 20,000 operating hours, and a residual value of $6,600. The equipment was used for 8,700 hours during Year 1, 7,380 hours in Year 2, and 3,920 hours in Year 3. Required: 1. Determine the amount of depreciation expense for the three years ended December 31 by (a) the straight-line method, (b) the units-of-activity method, and (c) the double-declining-balance method. Also determine the total depreciation expense for the three years by each method. (Note: For STRAIGHT-LINE ONLY, round the first two years to the nearest whole dollar, then round the third year as necessary. For DECLINING BALANCE ONLY, round the multiplier to five decimal places. Then round the answer for each year to the nearest whole dollar.) 2. What method yields the highest depreciation expense for Year 1
Business
1 answer:
Luden [163]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

  • Straight-line method: $36,667 yearly depreciation expense for 3 years.
  • Unit-of-production method: Year 1 - $47,850, Year 2 -  $40,590, Year 3 - $21,560
  • Double-declining method: Year 1 - $77,737, Year 2 -  $25,910, Year 3 - $6,353

Total for 3 years is $110,000 for all the depreciation methods.

Explanation:

(A) Under straight-line method, depreciation expense is (cost - residual value) / Estimated useful life = ($116,600 - $6,600) / 3 years = $36,667 yearly depreciation expense.

Accumulated depreciation for 3 years is $36,667 x 3 years is $110,000.

(B) The unit-of-production method is used when the asset value closely relates to the units of output it is able to produce. It is expressed with the formula below:

(Original Cost - Salvage value) / Estimated production capacity x Units/year

At Year 1, depreciation expense (DE) is: ($116,600 - $6,600) / 20,000 operating hours x 8,700 hours = $47,850

At Year 2, depreciation expense (DE) is: ($116,600 - $6,600) / 20,000 operating hours x 7,380 hours = $40,590

At Year 3, depreciation expense (DE) is: ($116,600 - $6,600) / 20,000 operating hours x 3,920 hours = $21,560

Accumulated depreciation for 3 years is $47,850 +$40,590 + $21,560 = $110,000.

Note that this depreciation method results in higher depreciation charge when the asset is heavily used, at this time, it was in Year 1.

(C) The double-declining method is otherwise known as the reducing balance method and is given by the formula below:

Double declining method = 2 X SLDP X BV

SLDP = straight-line depreciation percentage

BV = Book value

SLDP is 100%/3 years = 33.33%, then 33.33% multiplied by 2 to give 66.67% or 2/3

At Year 1, 66.67% X $116,600 = $77,737

At Year 2, 66.67% X $38,863 ($116,600 -  $77,737) = $25,910

At Year 3, 66.67% X $12,953 ($38,863 -  $25,910) = $8,636. This depreciation will decrease the book value of the asset below its salvage value $12,953 - $8,636 = $4,317 < $6,600. Depreciation will only be allowed up to the point where the book value = salvage value. Consequently the depreciation for Year 3 will be $6,353.

Accumulated depreciation for 3 years is $77,737 + $25,910 + $6,353 = $110,000.

You might be interested in
Harlan Corporation deposits $225,000 every June 30th and December 31st in a savings account (beginning in the current year) for
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

$1,419,327.22

Explanation:

The formula for calculating the Future Value (FV) of an Ordinary Annuity is used as follows:

FV = M × {[(1 + r)^n - 1] ÷ r} ................................. (1)

Where,

FV = Future value of the amount after 3 years = ?

M = Annuity  payment = $225,000

r = Semi annual interest rate = 4% ÷  2 = 2%, 0.02

n = number of periods the investment will be made = 3 × 2 = 6

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

FV = $225,000 × {[(1 + 0.02)^6 - 1] ÷ 0.02} =  $1,419,327.22

Therefore, Harlan Corporation will have $1,419,327.22 at the end of three years.

6 0
3 years ago
On January 15, 2020, Dolan Corp. adopted a plan to accumulate funds for environmental improvements beginning July 1, 2024, at an
Andreyy89

Answer:

Annual deposit (PMT) = $1,567,060.39

Explanation:

Given:

Future value of annuity due = $8,000,000

Rate of interest(r) = 10% = 0.1

Number of year (n) = 4 year

Annual deposit (PMT) = ?

Computation of annual deposit :

Future\ value\ of\ annuity\ due = PMT [\frac{(1+r)^n-1}{r} ](1+r)\\\\8,000,000 = PMT [\frac{(1+0.1)^4-1}{0.1} ](1+0.1)\\\\8,000,000 = PMT [\frac{(1.1)^4-1}{0.1} ](1.1)\\\\8,000,000 = PMT [\frac{(0.4641}{0.1} ](1.1)\\\\8,000,000 = PMT [5.1051]\\PMT = 1,567,060.39

Annual deposit (PMT) = $1,567,060.39

6 0
3 years ago
As a store manager, Leah has to play the role of negotiator, such as purchasing products at a fair price for her company. As she
zaharov [31]

Answer:

decisional

Explanation:

She is playing a decisional role in the above scenario since she has to make the necessary arrangements and arguments and select the best possible price for the given scenario.

7 0
3 years ago
You have recently won the super jackpot in the Washington State Lottery. On reading the fine print, you discover that you have t
icang [17]

Answer:

should choose option a

Explanation:

option a)

annuity due, 31 payments of $180,000 per year, 6.25% discount rate

Present value = $180,000 x 14.40432 (PV annuity due factor, 6.25%, 31 periods) = $2,592,726

option b)

$500,000 today + ordinary annuity, 30 periods, 6.25%, $144,000

present value = $500,000 + ($144,000 x 13.40432 [PV annuity factor, 6.25%, 30 periods)] = $2,430,222

6 0
3 years ago
Integrated Masters Inc. (IMI) is presently operating at 80% of capacity and manufacturing 116,000 units of a patented electronic
balu736 [363]

Answer:

a. $3.13 per unit

b. No

c Yes

Explanation:

The computation is shown below

a. Fixed overhead per unit is

= Fixed overhead ÷ Number of units manufactured

= $363,000 ÷ 116,000 units

= $3.13 per unit      

b. The cost calculation is not appropriate because the fixed overhead per unit is not be involved while calculating the cost

c. Now the acceptance of the offer should be based on total relevant cost which is            

Total relevant cost

= $6.1 + $6.1 + $8.1

= $20.3  

Since the offer is accepted because total relevant cost is less than the offered purchase price i.e $24.50    

       

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Trading one good or service for a good or service of equal value is called
    11·2 answers
  • Savings account A and savings account B both offer APRs of 6%, but savings account A compounds interest semiannually, while savi
    15·1 answer
  • A department using the FIFO method for process costing begins the month with 10,000 units which were 70% complete at the end of
    5·1 answer
  • Eastline Corporation had 13,500 shares of $5 par value common stock outstanding when the board of directors declared a stock div
    15·1 answer
  • Assume that one year ago you bought 130 shares of a mutual fund for $17 per share, you received a capital gain distribution of $
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose the real interest rate is 4% and expected inflation is 1% . What is the nominal interest rate? nominal interest rate: %
    10·1 answer
  • ____________________ is leveraging cross-border differences in needs and wants of the firm's target customers.
    14·1 answer
  • Jennifer and Jamie are starting a business and have asked you for advice about whether they should form a partnership, a corpora
    6·1 answer
  • The competitive test that a business plan must pass to attract financing from lenders and investors involves proving ________. G
    13·1 answer
  • ↑ State 4 ways in which a business may increase its profit ​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!