Answer:
Unlike now, people couldn't just take any environment and turn it into a place for travel if a few days to weeks. Travel through a tough mountain range would be extremely difficult compared to a nice flat lands. Trade was essential for the new england colonies due to the them being away from the mainland. New england had to have good trade with the middle colonies and southern colonies and depended on geography good for travel with goods to and from market places.
They encouraged Americans to move west.
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
I'd say it would be speaker 4 since it mentions a specific interest like you said
The justification was based around the facts that the King of Britain was used to involving the colonies in his own wars and imposing laws without having representatives from the colonies in the British Parliament. John Locke's social contract was important because people believed that they should have what he defined as unalienable rights and that they should have consent of the governed.
