4 years ago

Do you think judges should be elected or appointed? Explain why or why not.

1 answer:

4 0

I believe that judges should not be elected. If we were elected, it could prove to be more difficult to remain completely unbiased. If we were elected by the people, their arguments and opinions could influence decisions. Therefore, by being appointed by the president, judges can remain unbiased and completely fair, which will produce the best outcomes in the court of law.

You might be interested in

Which caused the US army to take over atomic research in the early 1940s?

netineya [11]

The U.S. entry into WW2

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are 5 reasons why the Afghanistan war started?

Firlakuza [10]

Here this website should help you!

https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-war-in-afghanistan-causes-timeline-controversy.html

if you need additional help just let me know!

hope this helped!

:)<span />

7 0

3 years ago

What did the south want from the Kansas Nebraska act?

Aleonysh [2.5K]

They wanted to continue the spread of slavery so they could expand their influence and continue their own way of life

3 0

3 years ago

If the government had supported unions instead of management in the late 19th century, how might the lives of workers have been

r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

If the government had supported unions instead of management in the late 19th century, Labor relations more peaceful; larger unions; higher wages; safer working conditions; lower profits.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which form of government, practiced in certain Greek city-states, describes rule by an individual who assumes absolute power by

Andrei [34K]

It would be an "authoritarian form of government" that forms when an individual assumes absolute power by seizing control illegally, <span>often with the support of the lower classes, since this usually occurs when there is a power vacuum. </span>

7 0

3 years ago