3 years ago

Do you think judges should be elected or appointed? Explain why or why not.

1 answer:

4 0

I believe that judges should not be elected. If we were elected, it could prove to be more difficult to remain completely unbiased. If we were elected by the people, their arguments and opinions could influence decisions. Therefore, by being appointed by the president, judges can remain unbiased and completely fair, which will produce the best outcomes in the court of law.

You might be interested in

What is the correct order of the steps used in the scientific method?

Ilya [14]

(1) pose a question (2) conduct background research (3) formulate a hypothesis (4) test the hypothesis (5) analyze the data and draw a conclusion (6) communicate the results

Hope this helps, and please mark me brainliest if it does!

7 0

3 years ago

How did this act impact England?

Fantom [35]

Answer:

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Synonym for "change"

dalvyx [7]

Answer:

Depends on what kind of change

Explanation:

Change as in "I will change my answer": switch

Change as in "I have so much loose change in my purse": coins

3 0

3 years ago

Which explorer was the first to sail the east coast of South America? For which country did he sail?

zzz [600]

Carbal was the first explorer to sail to the east coast of South America. He sailed for Portugal. Hope it help!

7 0

3 years ago

Why was Washington concerned about his responsibilities as a president?

Fittoniya [83]

The Answer to the question is A

5 0

3 years ago