3 years ago

Do you think judges should be elected or appointed? Explain why or why not.

1 answer:

4 0

I believe that judges should not be elected. If we were elected, it could prove to be more difficult to remain completely unbiased. If we were elected by the people, their arguments and opinions could influence decisions. Therefore, by being appointed by the president, judges can remain unbiased and completely fair, which will produce the best outcomes in the court of law.

You might be interested in

Why were the British soldiers called the<br> "Redcoats?"

Aleks04 [339]

They were called redcoats because of their red uniforms. They looked nice, but the uniforms were very uncomfortable. The jackets were made of wool.

4 0

2 years ago

What did the crittenden compromise do?

Karolina [17]

The Crittenden Compromise did: (Pic)

Hope this helped if so:

PLEASE MARK BRAINIEST

3 0

3 years ago

Adrew jackson presidincy supreme court cases

Troyanec [42]

Answer:

Jackson allegedly defied the Supreme Court over Worcester v. Georgia (1832), announcing, “John Marshall has made his decision now let him enforce it.” The case revolved around Georgia's attempt to apply state laws to Cherokee lands.

Explanation:

see answer

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A rubber ball is dropped from the top of a ladder . It bounces on the same spot on the ground several times, each time to a less

PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

gcr6cguhbov6

Explanation:

Test it out ........

4 0