1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Novosadov [1.4K]
3 years ago
6

Will give brainliest if right

Mathematics
1 answer:
inn [45]3 years ago
7 0

As the Remainder Theorem points out, if you divide a polynomial p(x) by a factor x – a of that polynomial, then you will get a zero remainder. Let's look again at that Division Algorithm expression of the polynomial:

Advertisement

p(x) = (x – a)q(x) + r(x)

If x – a is indeed a factor of p(x), then the remainder after division by x – a will be zero. That is:

p(x) = (x – a)q(x)

In terms of the Remainder Theorem, this means that, if x – a is a factor of p(x), then the remainder, when we do synthetic division by

x = a, will be zero.

The point of the Factor Theorem is the reverse of the Remainder Theorem: If you synthetic-divide a polynomial by x = a and get a zero remainder, then, not only is x = a a zero of the polynomial (courtesy of the Remainder Theorem), but x – a is also a factor of the polynomial (courtesy of the Factor Theorem).

Just as with the Remainder Theorem, the point here is not to do the long division of a given polynomial by a given factor. This Theorem isn't repeating what you already know, but is instead trying to make your life simpler. When faced with a Factor Theorem exercise, you will apply synthetic division and then check for a zero remainder.

Use the Factor Theorem to determine whether x – 1 is a factor of

    f (x) = 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7.

For x – 1 to be a factor of  f (x) = 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7, the Factor Theorem says that x = 1 must be a zero of  f (x). To test whether x – 1 is a factor, I will first set x – 1 equal to zero and solve to find the proposed zero, x = 1. Then I will use synthetic division to divide f (x) by x = 1. Since there is no cubed term, I will be careful to remember to insert a "0" into the first line of the synthetic division to represent the omitted power of x in 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7:

completed division: 2  2  5  0  7

Since the remainder is not zero, then the Factor Theorem says that:

x – 1 is not a factor of f (x).

Using the Factor Theorem, verify that x + 4 is a factor of

     f (x) = 5x4 + 16x3 – 15x2 + 8x + 16.

If x + 4 is a factor, then (setting this factor equal to zero and solving) x = –4 is a root. To do the required verification, I need to check that, when I use synthetic division on  f (x), with x = –4, I get a zero remainder:

completed division: 5  –4  1  4  0

The remainder is zero, so the Factor Theorem says that:

x + 4 is a factor of 5x4 + 16x3 – 15x2 + 8x + 16.

In practice, the Factor Theorem is used when factoring polynomials "completely". Rather than trying various factors by using long division, you will use synthetic division and the Factor Theorem. Any time you divide by a number (being a potential root of the polynomial) and get a zero remainder in the synthetic division, this means that the number is indeed a root, and thus "x minus the number" is a factor. Then you will continue the division with the resulting smaller polynomial, continuing until you arrive at a linear factor (so you've found all the factors) or a quadratic (to which you can apply the Quadratic Formula).

Using the fact that –2 and 1/3 are zeroes of  f (x) = 3x4 + 5x3 + x2 + 5x – 2, factor the polynomial completely.   Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved

If x = –2 is a zero, then x + 2 = 0, so x + 2 is a factor. Similarly, if x = 1/3 is a zero, then x – 1/3 = 0, so x – 1/3 is a factor. By giving me two of the zeroes, they have also given me two factors: x + 2 and x – 1/3.

Since I started with a fourth-degree polynomial, then I'll be left with a quadratic once I divide out these two given factors. I can solve that quadratic by using the Quadratic Formula or some other method.

The Factor Theorem says that I don't have to do the long division with the known factors of x + 2 and x – 1/3. Instead, I can use synthetic division with the associated zeroes –2 and 1/3. Here is what I get when I do the first division with x = –2:

completed divison: bottom row:  3  –1  3  –1  0

The remainder is zero, which is expected because they'd told me at the start that –2 was a known zero of the polynomial. Rather than starting over again with the original polynomial, I'll now work on the remaining polynomial factor of 3x3 – x2 + 3x – 1 (from the bottom line of the synthetic division). I will divide this by the other given zero, x = 1/3:

completed division:  bottom row:  3  0  3  0

 

3x2 + 3 = 0

3(x2 + 1) = 0

x2 + 1 = 0

x2 = –1

x = ± i

If the zeroes are x = –i and x = i, then the factors are x – (–i) and x – (i), or x + i and x – i. I need to   divided off a "3" when I solved the quadratic; it is still part of the polynomial, and needs to be included as a factor. Then the fully-factored form is:

3x4 + 5x3 + x2 + 5x – 2 = 3(x + 2)(x – 1/3)(x + i)(x – i)

You might be interested in
the happy play chargers $30 per hour for parties. Make a table of ordered pairs in which the x coordinate represents hours and t
Juli2301 [7.4K]
X:2,3,4,5.
Y:60,90,120,150
8 0
3 years ago
3. Naomi has earned $54 mowing lawns
kkurt [141]

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In the geometric progression 1, 2, 4… what term is 512?
Levart [38]

The next term is double the previous term, so that the n-th term is given recursively by

\begin{cases}a_1=1\\a_n=2a_{n-1}&\text{for }n>1\end{cases}

This rule tells us that

a_2=2a_1

a_3=2a_2=2^2a_1

a_4=2a_3=2^3a_1

and so on, with the explicit rule

a_n=2^{n-1}a_1=2^{n-1}

for n\ge1.

If 512 is the k-th term in the sequence, then

512=2^{k-1}\implies\log_2512=\log_22^9=\log_22^{k-1}\implies9=k-1\implies k=10

8 0
3 years ago
Sue needs 100 milliliter dog juice to make a batch of a juice drink.How many milliliters does she need to make 5 batches?
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

500

Step-by-step explanation:


4 0
3 years ago
Stella divides 12/8 on her calculator and gets 1.5. Assuming that Stella has not adjusted the calculator's settings, what do the
Romashka [77]

Stella divided 12/8.

If we divide 12 by 8, we get exactly 1.5.

Let us check given options one by one .

A) Stella made an error : Stella didn't made an error because it's just division of two numbers.

B) The answer is exactly 1.5.  : On dividing 12 by 8, we get exactly 1.5, so this option is correct.

C) The calculator rounded the answer. : On dividing 12 by 8, we get exactly 1.5. So, no rounding is required.

D) The calculator truncated the answer. : On dividing 12 by 8, we get exactly 1.5. So, no truncation in the answer.

Therefore, correct option is B) The answer is exactly 1.5.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • you have 1 bag of candy that has 95 pieces of candy .how much is each piece of candy if the price of the bag of candy is 9.94 us
    7·1 answer
  • Choose the friendly number that is closest to 25,689
    12·1 answer
  • Which process helps regulate Earth's climate by transporting warm seawater to colder regions of seawater?
    8·1 answer
  • How many MLB teams lost money (had a negative "Operating Income") in 2016?
    9·1 answer
  • 2(8x+9) distributive property
    13·2 answers
  • Since there are 6 faces on a die, there is 3/6 or 1/2 chance of rolling a die and getting an odd number. Is this empirical or th
    11·1 answer
  • Find the coordinates of the vertices of the figure after the given transformation: T<0,7>
    15·1 answer
  • Please answer the following question
    6·1 answer
  • HELP QUICK!!! ANSWER A B C D OR E
    10·2 answers
  • Mike hiked to a lake in 5.5 hours at an average rate of 4 1/5 miles per hour. Pedro hiked the same distance at a rate of 4 3/5 m
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!