Answer:
C. both personal events and historical events
<span>The Americans did not want a king in charge of their government/country. </span>
<span>The religious liberties expand during the era of the republic of texas is letter B which is "</span>Texas gained the right to vote for their religious leaders." Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
The three-fifths compromise is that A slave would count as three-fifths of a person when paying taxes. Option B is the answer.
<h3>What is Compromise agreement?</h3>
Compromise agreement was done between delegates from different state in 1787.
This is done between the Northern and the Southern states of the United States. The agreement is that three-fifths of the slave that were present in the country will be included in computing tax.
Therefore, The three-fifths compromise is that A slave would count as three-fifths of a person when paying taxes.
Learn more on compromise below
brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Absolutism was a very common form of government in Europe between the 16th and 19th centuries and defended the theory of the king's absolute power over the entire nation. The power of kings during the <u>Middle Ages </u>was considered limited compared to the absolutist period, as there was a lot of political fragmentation and the king's influence depended on a relationship of vassalage, in which the exchange of favors between kings and nobles guaranteed real power.
As modern nations were being structured, mainly England, France and Spain, and as trade resurfaced in Europe, a new social class emerged with great economic power: the bourgeoisie. For the bourgeoisie, the political and economic fragmentation that existed since the Middle Ages was not interesting, as it affected their business, mainly because of the differences in currency and taxes existing from one province to another (even in provinces of the same kingdom, there were these differences in currency and taxes).
The nobility, in turn, welcomed the concentration of power in the figure of the monarch as a way to guarantee control of the lands he owned. Thus, the concentration of power in the hands of the king was a demand from the rising bourgeoisie and also from the nobility.
