Assuming the traditional view of existential import, how many categorical syllogism forms are valid?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Ratling [72]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

All Forms Are Valid

Explanation:

Assuming the traditional view of existential import, categorical syllogism has all forms valid.

The traditional view of A and E prepositions are areas where existential assumption arises from.

Categorical syllogism forms are all valid because all syllogisms which are of the same form are equally valid or invalid. This validity is as a result of evaluating the traditional view of existential import.

To truly evaluate the validity of categorical syllogism, the following can be carried out :

1. Make a drawing of three overlapping circles and label each to represent major, minor and middle.

2. Make drawings of both syllogism's premises

3. Without drawing anything, look out for drawing of conclusion. Conclusion is done without drawing anything.

You might be interested in

A summary is when you take information from a source and reword and restructure it into

Zinaida [17]

Answer:

Paraphrasing

Explanation:

mark me brainliest! pls

7 0

3 years ago

How did the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825 affect life and economics in the United States? A. It reduced the cost of transpor

fgiga [73]

The answer is C... do you have any harder questions?

7 0

4 years ago

Why couldn’t Darius’ chariot get away, how was it stuck?

Anettt [7]

The chariot could not go over the dead bodies and had to go over leveled land.

8 0

3 years ago

In the holistic kinesiology approach outlined in the text, all of the following are true EXCEPT A cross-disciplinary approach to

Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

Philosophers and scientists don't have a moral obligation to work together; they should do so because it makes their respective work more interesting to pursue.

Explanation:

In the holistic kinesiology approach outlined in the text, philosophers and scientists have a moral obligation to work together so that works would have a purpose.

Therefore, the correct answer is option C.

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose you recently attended a dinner party. the invitation was extended to you by a close friend who had also been invited and

liq [111]

The answer to the question is that your social capital hasn’t expanded, or that you lost your chance to expand your social capital.

Social capital is defined as<em> resources that an individual gain by interacting with other people, which can come in the form of tangible and non-tangible resources, such as monetary aid, information, and ideas</em>. By not interacting with the police forces that were invited in the party, the individual in the question lost his chance to gain social capital to help him find a job in the criminal justice field.

4 0

3 years ago