<span>The answer is resistance. It is
loosely defined as a client's unwillingness to discuss a particular topic in
therapy.</span>
<span>There are uncountable reasons
why clients can be resistant within a therapeutic relationship. People of all
cultures, natures, and personalities visit psychologists, each with their own
reasons for entering therapy. Some people may be ordered or referred by a third
party to enter therapy. Since they are not there of their own will, these
clients are often unwilling to be there and can show very obvious struggle to
the process. Regardless, many clients show some sort of resistance to the
emotional pain that change demands. Clients can be unwilling and opposed to
change even if it is what they desire, as change can be difficult, emotionally
painful, or scary.</span>
Answer:
populations
Explanation:
thats what i think im doing the quiz right now
In the past, developmentalists believed that human intelligence is Static, whereas now it is commonly understood that intelligence is malleable.
Human intelligence:
- The capacity to learn from experience, adapt to novel circumstances, comprehend and manage abstract concepts, and apply information to influence one's surroundings are all components of human intelligence.
- Humans are cognitively capable of learning, forming concepts, understanding, applying logic and reason, as well as the capacities to recognize patterns, plan, innovate, solve problems, make decisions, retain information, and use language to communicate. These abilities are all a part of intelligence.
- Humans are often regarded as the most intellectual species on the planet; humans possess large brains that are superior to those of other animals in terms of processing speed and cognitive ability. In actuality, during millions of years of evolution, humans have demonstrated a tremendous growth in brain size and intelligence.
Learn more about human intelligence here brainly.com/question/16543469
#SPJ4
the marginal social benefit of producing and consuming another unit equals the marginal social cost.
Alexis de tocqueville referred to the ability of the majority in a democracy to impose its will on everyone else as <u>"the tyranny of the majority".</u>
The idea of the tyranny of the majority was advanced by the nineteenth century political scholars Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and John Stuart Mill (On Liberty). It alludes to a circumstance in which the greater part implements its will on a distraught minority through the equitable procedure. That is the thing that various minority bunches in the UK are encountering after Leave won the submission. Unexpectedly, this result has hurt the interests of the minority, as well as that of the dominant part that bolstered Brexit.
