Those with the power in democracy are arguable the individuals who are elected in a representative democracy or those that are in the majority in a strict definition of democracy. They keep their power by remaining in the majority position on issues that are important to them or continuing to be elected. And the role of the individual in a strict democracy is not very important because it is the collective that has greater strength than the individual but an individual can still vote to influence democracy.
<span>Differentiation is often a part of normal relational maintenance because two people have a firm sense of who and what they are. With this, they come together to realize their differences and similarities working towards a good compromise that would make their relationship work. When they do this, the relationship will have a stronger foundation ready to face any complications and trials along the way.</span>
<u>True.</u> A test that is administered in a consistent manner increases the reliability of a study.
<h3><u>What is dependability?</u></h3>
The consistency of a research study or measuring test is referred to as reliability in psychological research. One would anticipate seeing a similar reading, for instance, if they weighed themselves throughout the day. Weakly useful would scale that consistently assessed weight in a different way.
A similar comparison may be made to a tape measure that measures inches differently depending on how it is used. It wouldn't be regarded as reliable. Reliability comes in two flavors: <u>internal and external.</u>
- The consistency of outcomes across test items is measured by internal reliability.
- The level of variation between uses of a metric is referred to as external reliability.
Learn more about reliability of a study with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/1590454
#SPJ4
Answer:The judicial philosophy known as d. strict constructionism
Explanation:
Strict constructionism refers to a philosophy of the U.S law which states that the law must be applied as written when ruling a case and it doesn't allow any further judicial review of the law or constitution but only to apply it as it is.
The law is taken from the words exactly as they are written down which means the judge is not allowed to look at the intent of the law. This means there is no space left to allow the judge to scrutinize and consider the context under which that law was established or to examine it in relation to that particular case at that moment to see if it can truly be applied on that case. It is a narrow view that expect an individual to take what the law says and apply it with no question asked .
