1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elza [17]
3 years ago
10

Imagine you are reading an article about the goals of the national archives to reduce its energy use. What two facts could help

you know that this source is reliable and credible?
A. The information relevance to politics
B. The information statues as primary or secondary
C. The information creator and date of publication
D. The information topic and tone
History
2 answers:
matrenka [14]3 years ago
5 0

Correct answer:  

C. The information's creator and date of publication.

The information's creator and where the article is published should be reputable and solid.  A random blog by some guy is different from an article published in an established periodical and written by someone with credentials in the topic.  As to date of publication, you'd want to make sure the article was up-to-date with any current policies or actions being taken by the National Archives.

Some general  thoughts about how to assess sources of information you use:

Always examine the sources of information that the person or book or website uses.  Do they have actual sources of information or are they just presenting material without giving any backing or citations?  

Also examine the credentials of the author and publisher/website.  Is the author someone with training and a track record in the subject being covered?  (Example: A university professor in that subject area.)  If a website, does the website get cited by other agencies? If a book, has the book  been noted with any awards or strong reviews by knowledgeable people?

Does the person or site seek to offer objective information, or is it biased toward the support of only a particular position or agenda?  It's fine to take notice of sources that are biased, but then give attention to sources on BOTH sides of that bias, not just one side, so that you as a researcher can remain objective.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9555462#readmore

Oliga [24]3 years ago
3 0
B. the information statues as primary and secondary
D. The informations topic and tone
You might be interested in
Question 4 of 50
MatroZZZ [7]

The major similarity between Charles I and Catherine the Great was Both were intolerant of the Catholics living in their state. Thus the option (C) is correct.

<h3>Who was Catherine the Great?</h3>

Catherine II is known as the Catherine the Great was the queen of Russia and one of the most long ruling female is Russia. She is well known for the westernization of the Russia.

Charles I was the ruler of the England, this actions led to the frustration among the parliament and overthrew him from the thrown and executed in 1649. This was known as the civil war of the England.

One major similarity between Charles I and Catherine the Great was that both were were intolerant of Catholics living in their states.  Thus the option (C) is correct.

Learn more about Charles I here:

brainly.com/question/12716998

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Segregation and Discrimination.<br>Who was targeted for discrimination in the west? ​
klemol [59]

Answer: Native American

Explanation: Many people moved to the West and had taken over the lands of the Native Americans

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the second paragraph,what does Lincoln say that American (north and south )believed about the impending civil war why does he
alexgriva [62]

In the second paragraph Abraham Lincoln said that the north and the south never expected the war to be huge or last as long as it had lasted.

He did not believe that the South were responsible for the war due to the fact that he knew that both the North and the South were at fault and each played their own role in the war.

<h3>The American civil war</h3>

The civil war in the US was fought between the North and the South of the US. The way was due to the fact that the North had abolished the use of slaves.

Slavery was the major source of labor on the farms of the white plantation owners in the south.

Read m ore on the civil war here:

brainly.com/question/81234

6 0
2 years ago
Special courts are also known as what
tekilochka [14]
If you are talking about law then I believe the special courts are called legislative courts... If correct please give brainliest answer to me
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help, anyone!!
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:B

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 3. Did President Lincoln ever acknowledge that the Confederate States were a separate country?
    11·1 answer
  • Help!!
    9·2 answers
  • What was the British policy of refusing to enforce British laws in American
    13·1 answer
  • Following the American Revolution, the Confederation Congress was unable to resolve the nation’s economic crisis because it coul
    14·2 answers
  • The ideas described in Group B would most likely be the beliefs of which political party?
    12·2 answers
  • Why Was Eugene Debs was arrested by the government?
    9·1 answer
  • Three men walk into a hotel the room was $30 and each paid $10 later that day the manager realized that the room was only $25 do
    8·2 answers
  • Lagyan ng tsek b) kung tama ang ugnayang sanhi at bunga at elus kung mall
    14·1 answer
  • The Abbasid caliphate began to lose power because: A. the House of Wisdom was created in Baghdad. B. new laws forced non-Muslims
    10·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of this paragraph from a speech about solar enargy
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!