1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
3 years ago
14

Lake House. Harry has two houses, a house on the lake and a house in town. Rebecca wants to buy the house on the lake. Harry and

Rebecca orally agree that Rebecca will buy the house on the lake for $300,000. Harry hurriedly writes out a contract providing that he would sell "his house" to Rebecca for $300,000. Harry signs the top of the document. Rebecca does not sign at all. No merger clause is included in the contract. Harry backs out of the contract, and Rebecca sues him. He tells the judge that the statute of frauds is not satisfied because he did not sign the document at the end and because Rebecca did not sign at all. He also tells the judge that, at any rate, the agreement referred to the house in town, not the house on the lake; and that under the parol evidence rule, he had the right to identify the correct house. Which of the following is true regarding Harry's assertion that the statute of frauds is not satisfied because Rebecca did not sign the document?
1)Is there an enforceable agreement? Which elements of an enforceable agreement exist?
2)Why or why not is there an enforceable agreement? Can Rebecca sue him?
3)Can Harry testify about the $20,000 gift? Why or why not?
Business
1 answer:
Ronch [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. No

Explanation:

1 . Yes, there is an enforceable agreement between the seller (harry) and the buyer (Rebecca).

Elements of an enforceable agreement that exist between the contracting parties are:

Offer: Harry makes an offer to sell the house on the lake to Rebecca.

Acceptance: Rebecca accepts to buy the house on the lake from Harry for a consideration.

Consideration: Both the parties agree for a consideration i.e. $300,000.

Competency: Both the parties are competent and have capacity to enter into a contract.

Lawful purpose: Agreement between the parties was to transfer the ownership of the property from seller to the buyer. Hence, it is a lawful purpose.

2.Yes, it is an enforceable agreement because even though few essential terms were missing in the written agreement, the seller Rebecca would be allowed to prove her intention under due to the fact that the contract did not include merger clause. The court will look into the evidences or oral negotiations between the parties before entering into the contract.

The following essential elements were missing in the agreement at the time of entering into a contract:

The agreement should contain essential terms of the contract: name of the parties, subject matter, consideration.

Signature of both the parties.

Harry has only mentioned to sell “his house” and did not specify which house. This ‘issue’ can be resolved by parol evidence rule – because the agreement did not contain ‘no merger clause’ the court may allow to look outside the agreement in order to identify the intention of the parties. Therefore, Rebecca, under parol evidence rule, will be allowed by the court to identify the subject matter in case of the ambiguity.

Moreover, only the seller i.e. Harry signed the contract and not both the parties. This issue can be resolved by parol evidence rule. The court will look into the intention of the parties at the time of entering into the contract and hence, can make out that Rebecca wanted to buy the house on the lake.

Rebecca, therefore, can sue Harry.

3 . No, Harry cannot testify about the $25,000 gift because of the operation of the parol evidence rule. According to the parol evidence rule, any oral or written agreement (oral in this case) between the parties will not be taken into consideration that contradicts or varies the written contract.

Hence, Harry cannot testify about the $25,000 housewarming gift.

You might be interested in
According to the box, "Will Strategy Robots Replace Managers?", with robots having the capabilities to do a multitude of busines
musickatia [10]

Answer:

The options for this question are the following:

A. Companies do not want to eliminate all jobs at once.

B. Machines cannot do the jobs of humans, like recommend cancer cures or make banking decisions.

C.  There is a level of reasoning and strategy that only humans have the ability to do.

D. Machines are only useful in manufacturing duties.

The correct answer is C. There is a level of reasoning and strategy that only humans have the ability to do.

Explanation:

There are two variables that limit machines. One is the excessive consumption of energy that some devices require to carry out their activities.

For example, some prototypes that simulate some everyday human tasks, such as walking or doing housework, typically have a battery life of 15-20 minutes.

The second has to do with the costs of incorporating high-end computers that allow robots to recognize spaces and make decisions on the go.

“For a human being it is easy to identify if he is in a room, a room or a hall. Robots need cameras and computers to process that information, "adds Ramírez.

To understand that point, a relationship must be established: a home computer has four cores to process information. However, artifacts of up to 50 cores are needed to perform these space recognition operations in a timely manner, which would increase the cost of robot production.

7 0
3 years ago
If your income is ​$5353 a​ month, the price of pizza is​ $5 and the price of a video is​ $4, how many pizzas will you buy and h
musickatia [10]

Answer:

We can rent 1,070.6  videos or purchase 1,338.25 pizzas or any combination between the budget line attached

Explanation:

We have to divide our income for the cost of each item and them draw the budget line

$5,353 / 5 = 1,070.6

$5,353 / 4 = 1,338.25

4 0
2 years ago
The two most common forms of primary research are​ ________.
cricket20 [7]
Surveys and Interviews. Hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Siebel Incorporated, a non-publicly traded company, has 2009 after-tax earnings of $25 million, which are expected to grow at 6
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.

a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?

Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)

Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)

Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars

 

"WAAC calculation

Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.

so

Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)

    = 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%

b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?

Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be               calculated as shown below

 Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars

Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.

c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?

By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.

8 0
3 years ago
The proactive prevention technique, ________, occurs when the marketing or public relations department suggests that something r
dsp73

The proactive prevention technique enhancements occur when the marketing or public relations department suggests that something relatively small is a bigger deal.

The American Public Relations Association defines public relations as "a strategic communication process that builds mutually beneficial relationships between an organization and its public." Basically, a PR specialist manages the public image and reputation of the organization.

Public relations is a unique management function that helps establish and maintain the interrelationships of communication, understanding, acceptance, and cooperation between an organization and the general public.

Learn more about public relations here

brainly.com/question/20313749

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Fitness is a magazine for women about health and exercise. Fitness offers year subscriptions for $12 on their website. Jess, Ani
    7·2 answers
  • The hr manager told jim that the company pays the total health insurance costs for a family of four. as a single man, this benef
    10·1 answer
  • When targeting customers of the consumer population to market a
    6·1 answer
  • In a company's SWOT analysis, which of the following is an example of a threat?
    8·1 answer
  • What is not a duty the agent owes the principal?
    9·1 answer
  • Telefonica Brasil Customer-Retention Program. Telefonica Brasil is one of the largest telecommunications companies in Brazil. It
    15·1 answer
  • I no longer have a question
    11·2 answers
  • Ill GIVE BRAINLIEST
    6·1 answer
  • The principle that people face tradeoffs applies to:.
    11·1 answer
  • Starbucks is a global company that provides high-quality coffee products. Assume that as part of its expansion strategy, Starbuc
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!