1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
monitta
3 years ago
10

What are two factors that contributed to the rise of a Scientific Revolution in Europe in the mid 1500's?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Nimfa-mama [501]3 years ago
4 0
1) The invention of the printing press- this has contributed to an easier distribution of books, which as a result became more accessible. Many people had access to scientific knowledge for the first time.


2) geographical exploration- it inspired people and provided new knowledge.
You might be interested in
What is a closed primary?
drek231 [11]

A party election where only registered democrats or republicans can vote

6 0
3 years ago
Can you help me with some of the questions please?
denpristay [2]

Answer:

Gun range, girls underwear, all sorts of strange things. There was no hard evidence that he committed the crime which made it difficult to prosecute him.

Ivins was put under periodic surveillance and an FBI document stated that he was "an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks". On July 29, 2008, Ivins committed with an overdose of acetaminophen

The 77-page report from the Government Accountability Office says the FBI's research, including novel microbial forensic tests, did not provide a full understanding of how bacteria change in their natural environment and in a laboratory. This failure to grasp the reason for genetic mutations that were used to differentiate between samples of anthrax bacteria was a "key scientific gap" in the investigation, the report says.

The GAO also found a lack of rigorous controls over sampling procedures and a failure to cite the degree of uncertainty in measurement tools used to identify genetic markers.

"Although the complexity and novelty of the scientific methods at the time of the FBI's investigation made it challenging for the FBI to adequately address all these problems, the agency could have improved its approach," the report said.

The GAO report confirms what I have often said — that the FBI's definitive conclusions about the accuracy of their scientific findings in the Amerithrax case are not, in fact, definitive," Holt said in a written statement.

An acclaimed government scientist who assisted the federal investigation of the 2001 anthrax mailings said Tuesday that he erred seven years ago when he told top Bush administration officials that material he examined probably had been altered to make it more deadly.

The scientist, Peter B. Jahrling, had observed anthrax spores with the aid of an electron microscope at the government’s biological warfare research facility at Ft. Detrick, Md

Explanation:

The presence of silicon was viewed with alarm because the material, if artificially added to the anthrax, would make it more buoyant in air and more capable of penetrating deeply into the lungs.

“I believe I made an honest mistake,” Jahrling said in response to questions e-mailed to him for this article, adding that he had been “overly impressed” by what he thought he saw under the microscope.

“I should never have ventured into this area,” said Jahrling, who is a virologist, referring to his analysis of the anthrax, which is a bacterium. Jahrling’s initial analysis -- and his briefing of officials at the White House

At Tuesday’s hearing, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), pressed Mueller anew about how the silicon got into the spores.

After being informed of the events at the hearing, Jahrling renounced his earlier analysis.

“In retrospect,” Jahrling said, “I believe I was mistaken and defer to the experts.”

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis states that a. linguistics is only applicable to cultures with written records. b. language construct
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

language constructs our perception of reality

Explanation:

Sapir-Whorf is also known as the hypothesis of linguistic reality, It explains that human language structure affects the way he perceive things. The language of a person can influence how life issues are been perceived.

There are two hypothesis to this,

Stronger hypothesis it was in place by early linguist before the beginning of world war two it says human thought is a function of his language.

Weaker hypothesis was upheld by modern linguistics it says that language can only influence our thoughts and decisions we make.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the application of Missouri territory for statehood cause two years of intense debate? (5 points) It applied to become a
masha68 [24]

Answer:

Congress was concerned about how admitting it as a slave state would affect representation and the balance of power between states.

Explanation:

During that period, Missouri was a huge area that was called Missouri Territory and by 1819, there were enough people in part of that so it could be considered a state. But to be considered a state the Congress had to approve it.

In that period there was a struggle between free states and pro-slavery states the union wanted a balance between those two and the addition of a new state could ruin that balance.

The admission of Missouri would have added a slave state to the Senate and left northern non-slave states as a minority. This is the reason the application of Missouri caused a two-year debate.

6 0
3 years ago
Read the following excerpt from Federalist #3 by John Jay.
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The Federalists believed in the formation of a strong central government, thinking a central government would help to unify the nation and address issues of war or conflict in a way that protects the people. A strong national government will help to ensure the effectiveness of military, foreign diplomacy and national reputation. One unified government is more effective than 13 (now 50) separate state governments attempting to coexist peacefully, also this would eliminate states declaring war on each other (then the civil war happened sooo that's that)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Justinian Code has unquestionably formed the basis for many codes of law in countries around the world today. Do you think the l
    13·1 answer
  • A counterclaim is: a. made by a defendant. b. part of the complaint. c. part of the interrogatories. d. none of the above
    14·1 answer
  • To no ones surprise, Joe didn't have his homework ready.
    8·1 answer
  • Sandy is trying to decide which new soft drink to try. she decides to try "bliss mist" because it has a prettier bottle and the
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it wrong to responds to conflict by confrontation
    9·1 answer
  • ack's professor has asked him to pinch his classmate, Jill, to wake her up during class. What is Jack likely to do and why
    13·1 answer
  • Thinking about party systems, which of the following is NOT an example of “equilibrium?”
    14·1 answer
  • Trying this again cause no one answered last time #sad [GOV]
    8·1 answer
  • Whed is meant by social snice organization?​
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these principles of government
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!