Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
Answer:
A flashback
Explanation:
Flashback is a vivid imagery experience. In this term, a person will relieve that experience and feel like it happened right now. It can compare with the that we watched a video but in flashback memory, we could not watch the full story of images from start to end.
It can happen with the experience of the full or partial image.
An individual will notice that sound, smell or other things that related to the trauma.
In this term, the patient will feel the pain and pressure emotionally.
In this term, the patient will experience the feelings that happened during the trauma.
The characteristics are consistent with pectus excavatum are:
- The patient has a markedly sunken sternum.
- The condition is congenital, not symptomatic.
- The depression is more noticeable on inspiration.
<h3>What is Pectus excavatum?</h3>
Pectus excavatum can be regarded as the congenital chest wall deformity in people especially men.
It is a deformity that is usually congenital, not symptomatic and it is been caused by growth abnormality of the cartilage which found between the ribs and breastbone.
Read more on pectus excavatum here:
brainly.com/question/12809344
#SPJ11
Answer: I believe its true.
You might want more than my answer to confirm but again, I believe its true
Explanation:
