According to St. Thomas' natural law theory, people employ three criteria to determine what is good or evil: fulfilling their actual nature, pursuing happiness, and obeying God's mandates.
Natural law theory:
- According to the ethics and philosophy notion known as "natural law," human beings have inherent values that guide their thought and behavior. According to natural law, people naturally possess these concepts of good and wrong; they were not developed by society or legal authorities.
- Ancient Greeks were aware of the principle of natural law, which was later developed by other philosophers. Aristotle, Plato, and Thomas Aquinas are three significant philosophers who helped shape natural law. The natural law hypothesis has been surrounded by numerous issues and worries.
- In philosophy, natural law is a theory of justice or right that is believed to be universal to all people and derived from the laws of nature rather than from positive laws or social norms.
Learn more about natural law theory here brainly.com/question/11298929
#SPJ4
<u>Explanation:</u>
Historical context: The text tells the story of one of America's most deadly storms; The Schoolchildren’s Blizzard of 1888. We can remember, that at the time there were no advanced/efficient weather forecasting tools and they were way through the winter season.
Intended audience: The text was intended for those who did not witness the events of that tragic day. For example, this was indicated with the statement <em>"In the 1930s, during the Great Depression, the WPA Federal Writers’ Project...created by the US government...interviewed survivors of the Schoolchildren’s Blizzard."</em>
Author's purpose: The author only seeks to narrate events that occurred by including the accounts of those who witnessed and survived it.
Author's point of view: The opening lines of the text reveals his point of view when he said,<em> "The winter of 1887–1888 was one of the worst on record for the Midwest."</em>
A tuition difference between in-state and out of state students is an example of: How states make exceptions to the privileges and immunities clause.
<h3><u>What is in-state vs. out-of-state tuition?</u></h3>
The privileges and immunities clause emphasizes that a state cannot discriminatorily treat residents of other states. People from one state need to have the same rights in all of them. This is refuted by the tuition differential between in-state and out-of-state students.
- A student who resides permanently in the state where their university is situated is said to be paying in-state tuition. The cost that out-of-state students, including those from abroad, pay to attend a public state institution is referred to as out-of-state tuition.
- Typically, in-state tuition is far less expensive than out-of-state tuition.
- For instance, the School of Undergraduate Studies at The University of Texas at Austin costs residents of the state $5,624 for 12 or more credits. Out-of-state students pay $19,464 for the same courses, which is a difference of approximately $14,000.
To view more about state, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13487755
#SPJ4
A lot of the answers to questions like these are on a site called quizlet it’s very helpful and gives detailed answers.
Wundt, Wilhelm Max first laboratory <span />
