Answer: Constant price and Current price
Explanation:
Real income and nominal income is calculated respectively at the constant price and the current price.
The constant prices has to do with the real values that has taken inflation into consideration. They are typically in real value.
The current prices are the prices of goods and services at a particular point in time. Current prices are typically in nominal value.
Therefore, the answer is option D.
Answer:
Break-even point in units= 2,984 units
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The one-time fixed costs will total 49982. The variable costs will be $8.50 per book. The publisher will sell the finished product to bookstores for 25.25 per book
<u>To calculate the break-even point in units, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per unit
Break-even point in units= 49,982/ (25.25 - 8.5)
Break-even point in units= 2,984 units
Answer:
high,high
not all prices adjust quickly
below
Explanation:
According to the sticky-wage theory, the economy is in a recession because the price level has declined so that real wages are too high, thus labor demand is too high.
Real wages decline as nominal wages are adjusted. As a result, the economy returns to full employment
According to the sticky-price theory, the economy is in a recession because not all prices adjust quickly.
As people observe the lower price level, the economy returns to the long-run aggregate supply curve.
According to the misperceptions theory, the economy is in a recession when the price level is below what was expected.
As people observe the lower price level, their expectations adjust.
I believe the answer would be C.
Because you are dividing the dining chairs by the number of workers... That would give you the total amount of chairs that each worker assembled. Then you divide that by the 5 days and you would get the number of chairs that each worker assembled each day.
So, the answer would be C
Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
