The key factor is the description of the vehicle, making this case highly solvable.
Progress in crime lab methods and PC innovation are helping the police to find vehicles associated with violations. Because of new forensic devices, even modest bits of a car, or a faint impression from a tire tread, can limit the rundown of suspect vehicles. The police would then be able to cross-reference that data with data in the region and examine a subset of autos. In the given case we have a load of information about the car used which can easily lead to the criminal.
it's his job to take customer orders and make sure the items are in stock, his role is a stockist, and it's alex's job to pack and deliver these istemrs to the customer, he's a packer.
<h3>What are the functions of a stockist?</h3>
A stockist is responsible for managing the stock, receiving goods and knowing where each type of product is. This professional should organize the products and separate them by categories to make it easier to find them.
<h3>What is a packer?</h3>
The Packer packs, bags and boxes the goods. He also provides support by transporting products to the various areas of an establishment. In addition to checking the weight, prices and codes of the merchandise, this professional is responsible for forwarding documents, objects and serving customers.
With this information, we can conclude that his role is a stock clerk, and it is the job of packer Alex.
Learn more about packer in brainly.com/question/21054436
#SPJ1
Answer:Addition to net income in the operating activities section
Explanation:
Answer:
There is 30% dissimilarity.
Explanation:
Dissimilarity index is = 0.5 × ∑ | (a÷A) - (b÷B) |
Where
,
a= population of white in neighborhood
b= population of black in neighborhood
A= total population of whites
B= total population of blacks
Thus we can solve,
= 0.5 × { | (100÷200) - (20÷100) | + | (50÷200) - (50÷100) | + | (50÷200) - (30÷100) |}
= 0.3
Thus there is 30% dissimilarity.
Explanation:
Part 1 : <u>True</u>, from the details provided about the movie studio total cost last year indicates after substractions of the differences in total
3rd movie cost - 2nd = 132-84 = 48 million
Therefore, the variable costs should greater than or equal to $47 million, but less than $255 million.
Part 2 : <u>False</u>, the marginal cost of producing the first movie was $45 million. And there were three movies made by the firm.
Therefore, the firm's variable costs of producing all three movies last year would be
45 x 3 = 135 million