20 pages in one night times 3 nights = 60. 60 pages times 3 problems per page is 180 problems.
20*3=60
60*3=180
Answer:
1. I feel like Pat's new strategy isn't ethical. Pat doesn't pay for the suits; he just buys them and then returns them. Pat benefits, but the store he gets the suits from doesn't. In fact, they are harmed from this transaction because they are unable to have the suit for others to buy while Pat has it. There could be consequences with this strategy. For example, the suit might be damaged, and Pat won't be able to return it. Another problem is that others might find out about Pat's strategy, and they might view them as unprofessional. This is a problem for Pat since the reason Pat wore those suits was to look professional.
2. The stores are harmed from this transaction. They are unable to sell the suits to other buyers. The stores lose potential customers, so the stores lose potential money.
3. The companies should record that Pat had bought the suit only to return it the next day, so that they can act accordingly when Pat or someone else comes back to "buy" a suit.
Explanation:
Answer:
$400,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Development cost incurred = $2,000,000
Amount incurred after the technological feasibility was achieved = $400,000
Now,
The Software development costs that would be capitalized in 20X1
= Cost incurred after achievement of technological feasibility
= $400,000
Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct Option: A.supply whatever amount consumers demand at a price determined by the minimum point on the typical firm's average total cost curve.
In the long run, equilibrium price of a perfectly competitive firm implies that there is no economic profit for the firm. This situation occur when the marginal cost is equal to the average total cost.
The firm is break even when the price is equal to the minimum point of average total cost of the firm. So, there is no possibility of economic profit for the firm.
Answer:
First option will be recommended.
Explanation:
To determine which option to be taken, we calculate the net present value each option generates. The option generating higher NPV should be recommended.
- Net present value of first option = Lump sum receipt = $150,000.
- Net present value of second option will be found by discounting cash flows at investing rate 12% and calculated as followed:
+ Present value of 20 equal annual payment of $14,000 + Present value of $60,000 paid in 20 years = (14,000/12%) x [ 1 - 1.12^(-20)] + 60,000/1.12^20 = $110,792.
As net present value of the first option is higher than the second option, first option will be recommended.
