Answer:
Christy knew that Roosevelt Park had a clean, lively creek running through it.
Explanation:
The sentence you were given is the following:
<em>Christy knew that Roosevelt Park had a creek.</em>
The options you were given are:
- Christy knew that Roosevelt Park had some water somewhere in it.
- Christy knew that Roosevelt Park had a clean, lively creek running through it.
- Christy knew that Roosevelt Park had fresh water.
- Christy knew that Roosevelt Park had a creek in it.
Elaboration can be defined as the process of adding more information about something, for example, adding details or expanding on an idea.
Now that we know this, we can put the question you were given in different words and say that Marty realized that sentence 6 lacked details. The option that represents the best way for her to revise it is the second one. This option additionally describes the creek (<em>a clean, lively creek)</em> Marty mentioned, which makes it the best one.
Livery - a servants uniform
descant - to make a comment or to discuss
tendering - to treat with regard
tempers - to make something less severe
the words help bring the piece of writing to life. they may help in creating imagery, and they may even help the reader feel like they are involved in the story. the choice of words can also help set the mood for the story like mysterious, happy, sad, etc.
In the excerpt from Thunberg's speech, she moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions, as explained below.
<h3>What is Thunberg's reasoning?</h3>
This question concerns the ending of the speech given by Greta Thunberg at the United Nations. Thunberg mentions the following:
- We can still have a 67% chance to stay below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise.
- To accomplish that, back in 2018, we had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit.
- However, that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
- In conclusion, our CO2 budget will be over in just 8 and a half years.
We can see that Thunberg goes from a general premise to a specific prediction about emissions. The premise consists of everything she says about the amount of CO2 we are allowed to emit. The prediction is that we will use up that amount in just 8 years.
With the information above in mind, we can select option B as the correct answer concerning Thunberg's reasoning. She moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions.
The missing excerpt is the following:
"To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise – the best odds given by the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] – the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on Jan. 1st, 2018. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
"How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just 'business as usual' and some technical solutions? With today's emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years."
Learn more about Greta Thunberg here:
brainly.com/question/28419470
#SPJ1
Answer:
A type of passive transport in which water moves from the lesser concentrated side to the more concentrated side
Explanation:
