That really depends on the scene. Can you edit your question and then send a  message to be to answer it? I could maybe see an attachment and or you could type the stanza you're having trouble with, and I could take a look at it for you. Send a message to me. Hope I helped a little! Bye!
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
nobody is ever really alone
Explanation:
 
        
             
        
        
        
Mark Brainliest please
The discourse on language in education has taken the intelligentsia by storm in the wake of the Single National Curriculum (SNC). The polarisation between various points of view is so intense that a meaningful debate is impossible. It is intriguing why the supporters of English distort some issues beyond recognition. Hence here is another attempt to clarify issues.
First, it must be restated that the discussion is not whether children should learn English or a local language. Those who support the local languages as the medium of instruction have always added ‘and English must be taught as a foreign language’. I have yet to figure out why we are accused of pushing out English from our education system to make our children backwards and incapable of handling technology. It seems to imply that even if we are failing to teach English correctly it is fine so long as we stick to our mantra of English and English alone.
        
             
        
        
        
Religious toleration is people allowing other people to think or practice other religions and beliefs.
When someone says they’re a theist and believe in something that you may think is absurd or crazy, you take them seriously anyway.
When someone says that they have to observe the Sabbath and will be unavailable, you take them seriously.
When someone politely apologizes that they can’t do something because it’s against their religious beliefs, with no harm to the other person, you accept their apology, realize they don’t mean to hurt you, and move on. (I’m excluding the case where this is being done because of discrimination or nefariousness).
When someone asks to eat in a restaurant that accords with their religion’s dietary laws, and this doesn’t negatively affect you, you go there instead of a different restaurant.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
i think answer is a but i am not sure but i think this is only the answer