Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the B) It rejected the authority of the monarch as legitimate.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little bit on the answer, it can be added that the authors of this text were clearly inspired by the ideas of the Enlightenment, such as its criticism of the corruption of the monarchy. Rousseau, for instance, pointed out that kings had been granted power by the will of the people, not by God, and, by the same token, that people could also take their power away from them if they were not doing their job right. In this excerpt, it is said that if a government, which derives its power from the "consent of the governed," that is, from the will of the people, destructs the rights that it is meant to protect (life, liberty, and happines), then that people have the right to alter it, abolish it, or institute a new one.
Because in the city there is more light and in the country there is less light
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. The missing section reads;
<em>"(6) Back along the cliffside, after some careful scrutiny, I've identified the female falcon as B/6. She has returned to her cliff nest with her prey held tightly in her talons. There appear to be young in the nest—a successful natural mating here on the rock face! This is what makes all our hard work worthwhile. The Peregrine Falcons are staging a real comeback!"</em>
Answer:
<u>B) The narrator is sure that the Peregrine falcon will remain off the endangered species list.</u>
Explanation:
We could notice the positive comment made by the narrator, William Princeton which says, "...<em>This is what makes all our hard work worthwhile. The Peregrine Falcons are staging a real comeback!"</em>
This comment by the narrator shows his strong conviction that the Peregrine falcon <em>will remain off the endangered species list.</em>
<em></em>
