Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Gerrymandering is the term used for the act of negotiating the layout of each district (the territory it will encompass) for the benefit of a specific politician or party. The word comes from the name of the American politician Elbridge Gerry, who in the 1800s redesigned the Massachusetts constituencies to benefit his allies. One of the districts was so absurdly shaped that it was shaped like a salamander and so the second part of the word was forged: gerryMANDERing. Gerrymandering occurs when the government interferes with district design to benefit vulnerable groups (as if it were an affirmative policy).
This political practice can cause polarization because groups not favored by gerrymandering will act contrary and raise issues that contradict the need to appeal to this practice. These questions will create a controversial scenario that will result in polarization.
It is correct to say that gerrymandering causes polarization, but it would be incorrect to say that this would be the only way to water polarization in the country.
In the case McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court considered whether Congress had the power to create a national bank and whether the state of Maryland had interfered with congressional powers by taxing the national bank.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of McCulloch and found that the state of Maryland had interfered with one of Congress’s implied powers.
I believe it is D, all of the above.
She has most likely been caught in traffic jam. This type of hassle affects our cognitive functioning because we get bored and angry and disoriented and it affects our reasoning or our memories or similar things. It passes quickly since being stuck in a traffic jam is not that of a big issue.
The point where the electrons leave an electrical circuit is called the “return” or “earth ground”.
