Answer:
The answer is: role playing on attitudes.
Explanation:
Zimbardo's controviersial experiment, also known as the Stanford prison experiment, aimed to simulate a prison environment and study the behaviors of both prisoners and guards (that were actually randomly assigned students).
Zimbardo wanted to focus on role playing and its influence on attitudes and behavior, which is why he asigned students randomly to both roles (prisoners or guards). He aimed to see if students that were asigned to be guards started to behave in such a way, and he discovered that role playing does have a strong influence on attitudes. Guards started acting violent and authoritarian towards prisoners, and prisoners also started defying their authority and causing riots.
Moral reasoning is the subdivision of psychology which involves the fundamental philosophy of moralities and integrities. Youngsters show moral reasoning skills at early adolescent age.
It’s a process by which a person can discriminate what is right and what is wrong. It can occur within one’s own self or between the individuals. It promotes healthy relationship when adhered to.
According to Higgins students from urban high school showcased a high moral reasoning as they were exposed to education from a very little age and they know to distinguish between what is good and what is not good.
Answer:
Amygdala
Explanation:
Amygdala is the part of the brain. It is a very important part of the brain that is integrated with emotions, behavior, and motivation. It is an almond-shaped structure that lies in the brain. In a person, there are normally two amygdala presented. It has been considered that it is the part of the limb system that is responsible for the instincts and memory. It is responsible for the perception of anger, anxiety emotions, sadness, and control of aggression.
Thus in the above context amygdala is the part of the brain that involves emotions such as aggression, anxiety, and high order thinking.
Let me find wat it is and then i will get it back too u
I believe the correct answer is the first option. In regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978), the supreme court determined that racial quotas in university were unconstitutional. It was a landmark decision that was made by the Supreme Court. It did not allowed race to be one of the factors in admission to colleges.
