A PWC must be operated in a reasonable and prudent manner. It is illegal to all the three mentioned points.
Explanation:
Weaving a PWC through congested waterway traffic may lead to fatal accidents due to narrow water path ways or some kind of obstruction. One must look for the clear waterway traffic to weave.
One should not operate in a manner that requires swerving at the last possible moment to avoid collision as doing so, again, may result in fatal accidents. It is always better for the operator to play safe while weaving a PWC as there is a very low chance of survival if, unfortunately, one meets with water accidents.
Again, it is never a good idea to jump the wake of another vessel unreasonably or unnecessarily close to that vessel or when visibility is obstructed as the visibility might be just an illusion which may result in unknowingly welcomed fatal accidents.
Answer:
Tourist did not know the rules and regulation of that society.
Explanation:
The reason for the appeal is that the tourist did not know the rules and regulation of that society or country so the tourist should not pay the fine and has to appeal against this fine. The institution imposed fines on the citizens of the country because they know the rules of that country but the tourists are new to the country and has knowledge about the rules so they should not pay the fine and has the right to appeal.
The answer is going to be B. Ross Perot. Perot was the candidate in 1992 who led one of the most successful independent campaigns.
I hope this answer helped! :)
Explanation:
Students about to take an exam would likely be experiencing higher than normal anxiety
