Answer:
Non-material culture
Explanation:
According to sociology, culture consists both in material culture and non material culture:
- Material culture refers to the <u>objects</u> that surround people from different places.
- Non material culture refers to the <u>ideas</u> that people have about their own culture. In other words, their <u>beliefs, norms, institutions, values, customs, languages, etc. </u>
This question asks us about the way of using objects, as well as customs, beliefs, philosophies, governments, and patterns of communication. This has to do with <u>ideas that people have about their culture and everything that is non physical.</u> Therefore, this is an example of non-material culture.
Answer:
Well, because it'll be very difficult to tell apart one object from another when one perceives there is an overlap between the two.
Explanation:
Let's remeber what Helmholtz said about perception, that it some times results from the assumptions we make about the enviroment without even being truely aware of it.
In this case, the umpire will have a really hard time judging wether it was "foul ball" or a "home run", given that his emotional status may pull him toward one call or the other.
Thankfuly, there are video-recording repetitions in baseball now.
Answer:A. amphetamine psychosis.
Explanation:
Amphetamine psychosis is a condition which affect an individual who overdose on amphetamine over a period of time . It is closely related to schizophrenia because it also includes a person experiencing similar symptoms like hallucinations, paranoia and erratic behavior.
These symptoms are prevalent in any kind of emphetamine drug if high doses are taken daily.
What Leads to Amphetamine Psychosis?
- Amphetamine releases dopamine into the brain which is what cause the negative symptoms.
Both the French and British wanted to control the lands west of the Appalachian mountains. They were extremely competitive over power and wealth due to the fact that they were two of the strongest powers in Europe. But this was only the start. After the British took the Ohio River Valley, bitterness increased because <span>France did not want to share to share the rich fur trade.</span>
A creation myth (or cosmogonic myth) is a symbolic narrative of how the world began and how people first came to inhabit it.[2][3] While in popular usage the term myth often refers to false or fanciful stories, formally, it does not imply falsehood. Cultures generally regard their creation myths as true.[4][5] In the society in which it is told, a creation myth is usually regarded as conveying profound truths, metaphorically, symbolically and sometimes in a historical or literal sense.[6][7] They are commonly, although not always, considered cosmogonical myths – that is, they describe the ordering of the cosmos from a state of chaos or amorphousness.[8]
Creation myths often share a number of features. They often are considered sacred accounts and can be found in nearly all known religious traditions.[9] They are all stories with a plot and characters who are either deities, human-like figures, or animals, who often speak and transform easily.[10] They are often set in a dim and nonspecific past that historian of religion Mircea Eliade termed in illo tempore ("at that time").[9][11] Creation myths address questions deeply meaningful to the society that shares them, revealing their central worldview and the framework for the self-identity of the culture and individual in a universal context.[12]
Creation myths develop in oral traditions and therefore typically have multiple versions;[3] found throughout human culture, they are the most common form of myth.<span>[6]</span>
