Answer:
We can make recommendations and conclusions about gender-based violence for our peers.
Regarding the recommendations, we can present arguments such as: A person should not be judged based on their gender, but on their actions and skills, we should not respond to any situation with violent acts, but with kindness and respect, every living being deserves to be respected and treated with consideration.
In relation to conclusions, we can present arguments such as: Everyone has the same rights and duties regardless of their genre, color, sexual orientation and religion. They should not be treated violently because of any of these factors.
Explanation:
Gender-based violence is characterized by the fact that one group of people (usually women) becomes the target of violence by another group of people because of their gender. This is because the aggressors see these victims as inferior and weak, who must be submissive to the wills that the aggressors have and must be punished as they see fit.
Answer:
<u>Option- </u>True.
- The following statement is correct in all sense, which is given to us as, <em>"According to Matsumoto and Fletcher (1996), culture influences human emotion and human physiology, particularly with respect to autonomic nervous system activity and the immune system."</em>
Explanation:
Culture is defined as the basic set of regional or community rules which are supposed to be followed by the individual living in that space or region, so, culture has a specific role in development of any person's nature, career, and identity inside any region. While, it gives a more different features or we can say characteristics to the individual as it particularly adjusts the person's autonomic nervous system activities and the immune system itself. As we can analyze that people belonging to different cultures have a more or less differently developed physical and mental well being as compared to other individuals of the different cultures.
Answer:
void
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of contracts, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this agreement between Skye and Nathan is an example of a void contract. A void contract is a formal agreement that is effectively illegitimate and unenforceable from the moment it is created. Which in this situation it is void because Nathan is clinically insane, thus not able to actually agree to anything.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The relationship between the Louisiana Purchase and political power was that it was seen as unconstitutional (and the Federalists argued this) to acquire this territory which spanned a huge region across the United States and Canada, but since Thomas Jefferson (who was then the President) had the final say, he decided this was because he had the most political power, so this showed he felt above the Constitution of the United States, because he had treaty power.
