Answer:
EAW = -$17,545.71
Explanation:
initial investment = $200,000
cash inflows;
- Year 1 = $33,000
- Year 2 = $44,000
- Year 3 = $55,000
- Year 4 = $66,000
- Year 5 = $77,000
- Year 6 = $88,000
- Year 7 = $99,000
- Year 8 = $110,000
- Year 9 = $132,000
cash outflows:
- Year 1 = $20,000
- Year 2 = $30,000
- Year 3 = $40,000
- Year 4 = $50,000
- Year 5 = $60,000
- Year 6 = $70,000
- Year 7 = $80,000
- Year 8 = $90,000
- Year 9 = $100,000
EAW = equivalent annual worth = equivalent annual benefits - equivalent annual costs
to determine the EAB we must first find the PV of the cash inflows using a financial calculator = $408,348.84
EAB = (PV x r) / [1 - (1 + r)⁻ⁿ] = ($408,348.84 x 10%) / [1 - (1 + 10%)⁻⁹] = $70,905.91
to determine the EAC we must first find the PV of the cash outflows (including initial outlay) using a financial calculator = $509,395
EAC = (PV x r) / [1 - (1 + r)⁻ⁿ] = ($509,395 x 10%) / [1 - (1 + 10%)⁻⁹] = $88,451.62
EAW = $70,905.91 - $88,451.62 = -$17,545.71
Answer:
It is called A PERMANENT FUND.
Explanation: A PERMANENT FUND is a type of governmental fund that is used to record and account for endowments such as gifts for government or non governmental organisations.
This fund often times is used in financing civic projects, facilities owned by the city concerned and the likes.
Answer:
the minimum price it should charge is $40 per unit.
Explanation:
Minimum Transfer Price = Variable Costs - Internal Savings + Opportunity Cost
<em>Note : Division A has capacity available to meet B's requirements therefore there is no opportunity cost</em>.
There are Internal savings of $5 as A's variable costs will be $5 less per unit.
Minimum Transfer Price = $45 - $5
= $40
The category that does not belong to the periodic evaluation is Change Analysis.
Option D is the correct answer.
<h3>What is a periodic evaluation?</h3>
Periodic evaluation is a technique that is totally developmental in nature and disregards the formal advice relating to tenure, retention, or promotion of employees.
Periodic evaluation has three broad categories namely, hazard analysis, safety, and health-related inspections, and evaluation relating to personal protective equipment (PPE).
Therefore, out of the provided options, Change analysis is not considered a category for periodic evaluation.
Learn more about the periodic evaluation. in the related link;
brainly.com/question/17095233
#SPJ1
Explanation:
1. The ceterus paribus effect gives us to what extent, the effect of a variable has on another variable, while holding all other factors fixed. Analysing job training of workers on productivity will give us results that are not biased since we will not be taking account of other factor variables in the calculations. When 2 firms are the same in almost every aspect apart from number of hours on training, then we will find out that each firm would have different levels of workers output. So we should know if workers output increases due to job training.
2. When it comes to provision of training, furms do these based on characteristics of the workers. Some of these characteristics are measurable while some are immeasurable
Measurable:
Experience on the job,
Productivity
Level of education,
immeasurable :
Skill set
Vision
Likeliness to bstay at firm
3. Apart from worker characteristics, productivity also depends on other factors one of which is technological change. A technological change can bring about increased efficiency and greater output by the worker. Different firms using different capital and technological combination are quite likely to have different output levels.
4. A positive correlation between job training and productivity cannot be used to ascertain if job training makes worker more efficient this is due to the fact that correlation only tells us if variables are in coexistence. So a positive correlation does not tell us that job training is indeed bringing about changes in the productivity of workers.
