<span>The looser interpretation of the law created a multimember executive whereas the strict interpretation created a one-person executive.
This filling in of the blanks creates an appropriate and meaningful sentence. Laws may be open to various interpretations. If "person" was thought to be a singular physical person, that would give rise to a strict interpretation for the purposes of the law and a "one-person executive". Operational definitions are important, and "person" could be interpreted as an "entity" or a "collective" in which case the looser interpretation of a law would be at play to create the "multi-member executive".</span>
Answer:
Economist A
Explanation:
Elasticity is a measure of investment sensitivity. If the investment is elastic, a slight increase in price (interest rate) will decrease the amount of investment. Conversely, if the investment is inelastic, a change in interest rates will not considerably affect the investment rate. The calculation of elasticity consists of the change in the investment rate divided by the change in the interest rate. If the calculation of elasticity is less than 1, it is considered ineastic, while investments with elasticity above 1 are considered elastic. Thus, economist A believes that the investment rate is elastic to the interest rate, while economist B believes the opposite. So for economist A the rise in interest rates will affect the investment rate of the economy (and hence the macroeconomic environment) because in his view investment is elastic. Economist B does not believe that interest rate fluctuations will affect demand for investments.
Original price = $500
Assume that the tax rate is 8%
Cost of the TV plus tax = 500*1.08 = $540
Worth of the 25% coupon = 0.25*540 = $135
Reduced price = 540 - 135 = $405
The cost of the TV with a coupon for 25% off excluding tax is $405.
Answer: $405
Answer:
Option (B) $5,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Repayment of Loan = $50,000
Interest = 8%
Cash flow Probability
$65,000 70%
$45,000 30%
Tax rate = 0%
Now,
Interest on loan = 8% of $50,000
= $4,000
Expected value of cash flow = ∑[cash flow × Probability ]
= ( 0.7 × $65,000 ) + ( 0.3 × $45,000 )
= $45,500 + $13,500
= $59,000
The owner's expected cash flow after debt service
= Expected value of cash flow - Interest on loan - Repayment of Loan
= $59,000 - $4,000 - $50,000
= $5,000
Hence,
Option (B) $5,000
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "c. Credit cards are canceled due to poor payment history." a sign of credit trouble is that <span>Credit cards are canceled due to poor payment history.</span>
