Answer:
This can be made possible through reproductive cells undergoing meiosis since such process has specialized sex cells split and multiple after copulation. To answer the question if is it possible for a human to survive without a reproductive system, the answer is yes.
Explanation:
The answer to your question is a
<span>After the third month of development, lanugo develops on the head (thin, first hair), the muscles and bones are formed an shaped, the mouth movement is possible, the liver and pancreas produce fluid secretions, meconium is made (stool of infant), reproductive organs are developed, but the baby's gender is difficult to distinguish on ultrasound.</span>
Answer: Combining a basic API with citric acid to produce the citrate salt of the API.
Explanation:
Chemical modifications refers to the processes that involve changes in the general composition of drugs to produce another entity with different chemical properties.
From the answer, Basic API combine with citric acid to produce the citrate salt of API which have different chemical properties from the reactants.
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
