Answer:
Explanation:
Using the EOQ Formula = EOQ
D = Demand = 773
O = Ordering Cost =28
H = holding Cost = 11*33% =3.63
So we have :
EOQ=
EOQ= 
EOQ=
EOQ= 
EOQ= 109.20196
Previous per unit order cost = 28/773 =0.03622
No of Orders = D/o
No of Orders = 773/109.20196 =7.0786
Cost per order =109.20196*0.03622 =3.9555
Total order cost= 7.0786*3.9555=27.9998
At EOQ holding Cost is equal to Order Cost
New Order cost =27.9998
Holding Cost = 27.9998
New cost As per EOQ = 56
Previous (33+28) = 61
Net Saving = 5
Answer:
Option c) how a consumer might trade off different levels of consumption of each of two goods, while staying at the same utility level.
Explanation:
This is the very definition of an indifference curve. The points in an indifference curve are the combinations of the quantities (level of consumption) of two different goods which will produce the very same utility to the consumer. The consumer will perceive any of those combinations as having the same utility for him.
For example, a usual graph of various indifference curves will look like the graph attached.
In this graph the combination of 2 pairs of shoes and 15 pants will be perceived as having the same utility as the combination of 5 pairs of shoes and 4 pants. Both are combinations in the same indifference curve, the green one, and the utility of any combination lying in that green curve will be rated the same: u = 1.
Answer:
d. the camry becomes an inferior good because the good is now perceived as lower in quality than a lexus
Explanation:
There are a number goods that over time, for a variety of reasons, transition from being a normal good to an inferior good or from being an inferior good to a normal good. One such example of a good is the Toyota Camry. In the 1980s, more income for a household usually resulted in more Camrys being purchased. However, today more Toyota Camrys are purchased by households that have experienced a reduction in income.
How could this happen?
<u>This could only have happened because of a change in perception in households over time. </u>
It is stated in the Scenario that ''today more Toyota Camrys are purchased by households that have experienced a reduction in income.''
<u>That means Toyota Camry has become an inferior good that is purchased more when income falls.</u>
<u>Hence, the only reason the scenario would have occurred is that the camry becomes an inferior good because the good is now perceived as lower in quality</u> than a lexus
Answer:
True
Explanation:
snce rita times 4 to the power of rodriquez is 24 then this is proven to be true
Answer:
The lump sum payment = $23,585.49
Explanation:
The winning lottery is an example of an advanced annuity. <em>An advanced annuity is a series of cash flows that occurs for a certain number of years with the first cash flow occurring now.</em>
The first cash flow is represents one out of the five, so the balance is a four-year annuity.
So we can work out the present value of the annuity for the last four years as follows:
PV = (1 - (1+r)^(-n)/r ) × Annual cash flow
r = 3%=0.03, n = 4, Annual cash flow = 5000
PV = (1- ((1+0.03)^(-4))/0.03) × 5,000
= 3.7170 × 5,000
=$ 18,585.49
The lump sum payment = PV of the first payment + PV of the four year annuity
The lump sum payment = $5000 + $ 18,585.49
= $23,585.49