The still-face interaction paradigm
<span>An experimental task was introduced in 1978 to prove that infants actively contribute to social interaction. It is called the Still-Face Paradigm or SFP.</span>
<span>In the experiment, 3 phases of face-to-face interaction of infants with an adult were tested: the normal interaction, the still-face (where the adult becomes unresponsive and maintains a neutral facial expression), and a reunion where the adult resumes normal interaction.</span>
<span>Indeed, the still-face paradigm showed effects like increased gaze aversion and less smiling. </span>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Because the injunction is the legal remedy that the special court's judge orders not the jury. The order enforce a party to do what must be done or refrains it from doing specific acts that harms the other party. So saying that Doorway sought the court injunction in which the jury decides the right course of action is incorrect because injunction is the warning of judge not of jury.
Answer:
c. a letter that falsely claims the writer represents a foreign bank.
Explanation:
A clearing house is a financial institution that should be created for exchanging the payments, securities, or transactions related to derivates. It stands between the two clearing firms. Its motive is to decrease the member risk that failed to honor the trade settlement liabilities
So the clearing house scam includes the victim that collect the letter in which there is false claims where the writer shows the foreign bank
Answer:
$62,160
Explanation:
Given:
Purchase price = $300,000
Down payment = 10% of purchase price = 0.1 × $300,000 = $30,000
Thus,
the cumulative amount to be financed = $300,000 - $30,000 = $270,000
The present value of an annuity of $1 per year for 8 years at 16% = $4.3436
Now,
Annual payment
= ( Cumulative Amount financed ) / ( Cumulative PV factor at 16% for 8 years)
= $270,000 / 4.3436
= $62,160.42
≈ $62,160
I don’t really know I just need points
