Answer: The profits would be shared equally
Explanation: This is because
Since there was no agreement stating how profits would be divided,then the applicable state Limited Liability Company statute will rule. Most LLC statutes states that if members do not specify how profits are to be divided, they will be divided equally. As long as no operating agreement or LLC statute addressed the particular issue, the partnership law applys which also indicates that profits should be divided equally among the owners of a firm unless it was specified otherwise.
Answer:
Explanation:
The current liability is that liability in which the obligation is arise for one year or less than one year.
So, the categorization is shown below:
a. A note payable for $100,000 due in 2 years. = It is not a current liability as it is due in 2 years that come under the long term liability
b. A 10-year mortgage payable of $300,000 payable in ten $30,000 annual payments. = Current liability for first annual payment only and rest is consider to be long term liability
c. Interest payable of $15,000 on the mortgage. = Current liability as it is arise within one year
d. Accounts payable of $60,000. = Current liability as it is arise within one year
The current liability is shown on the liabilities side of the balance sheet.
Answer:
a. $58,800
b. $57,820
Explanation:
Generally, notes are issued on the discounted or face value. It is face value when the price of the note is the same as the face value while it is discounted when the price of the note is lower than the face or par value.
a. Since the note is issued on the face value of $58,800 , it means that the proceed is the same amount. The proceeds from a note that is issued, is that price at which the note is issued.
b. Discount value
= $58,800 × 10% × 60/360
= $980
Proceeds
= Face/par value of the note - Discount value of the note
= $58,800 - $980
= $57,820
Answer:
Called the clients and cancelled jobs
Explanation:
If the plaintiff worked for the defendant and left to set up her own cleaning business, then she will most likely be bound by a non-compete clause.
So if she is saying she acted with the value of integrity, then she would called any of the defendant's clients and cancelled jobs in order to respect the non-compete clause.
However after sometime the non-compete clause is no longer binding.