Answer is 7.
55+5X=90
5X=90-55
5X=35
X=35/5
X=7
Answer:
680 games
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose that 681 tennis players want to play an elimination tournament.
1st round:
One of 681 players, chosen at random, sits out that round and 680 players play. There will be 340 winners plus one player which sits - 341 players for the next round and 340 games
2nd round:
There will be 170 winners plus one player which sits - 171 players for the next round and 170 games
3rd round:
There will be 85 winners plus one player which sits - 86 players for the next round and 85 games
4th round:
There will be 43 winners - 43 players for the next round and 43 games
5th round:
There will be 21 winners plus one player which sits - 22 players for the next round and 21 games
6th round:
There will be 11 winners - 11 players for the next round and 11 games
7th round:
There will be 5 winners plus one player which sits - 6 players for the next round and 5 games
8th round:
There will be 3 winners - 3 players for the next round and 3 games
9th round:
There will be 1 winner plus one player which sits - 2 players for the next round and 1 game
10th round - final:
1 champion and 1 game.
In total,
340 + 170 + 85 + 43 + 21 + 11 + 5 + 3 + 1 + 1 = 680 games
Step 1:
a) Write the quadratic model
a = -15.64
b = -1.24
c = 5.23

b) t = 0.30

c) t = 0.52 seconds

d) 0.30 is more likely to be relaible.
e)
The Answer is 7 cookies because she had 7 cookies filled in the jar and after making 7 more it becomes 14 so
Also 7+7=14
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Both expressions are examples of the <em>distributive property</em>, which basically says "if I have <em>this </em>many groups of some size and <em>that</em> many groups of the same size, I've got <em>this </em>+ <em>that</em> groups of that size altogether."
To give an example, if I've got <em>3 groups of 5 </em>and <em>2 groups of 5</em>, I've got 3 + 2 = <em>5 groups of 5 </em>in total. I've attached a visual from Math with Bad Drawings to illustrate this idea.
Mathematically, we'd capture that last example with the equation
. We can also read that in reverse: 3 + 2 groups of 5 is the same as adding together 3 groups of 5 and 2 groups of 5; both directions get us 8 groups of 5. We can use this fact to rewrite the first expression like this:
.
This idea extends to subtraction too: If we have 3 groups of 4 and we take away 1 group of 4, we'd expect to be left with 3 - 1 = 2 groups of 4, or in symbols:
. When we start with two numbers like 15 and 10, our first question should be if we can split them up into groups of the same size. Obviously, you could make 15 groups of 1 and 10 groups of 1, but 15 is also the same as <em>3 groups of 5</em> and 10 is the same as <em>2 groups of 5</em>. Using the distributive property, we could write this as
, so we can say that
.