Answer:
The prime factors that 27 and 36 share is 3x3.
Step-by-step explanation:
The prime factorization of 27 is: 3 x 3 x 3. The prime factorization of 36 is: 2 x 2 x 3 x 3. The prime factors and multiplicities 27 and 36 have in common are: 3 x 3. 3 x 3 is the gcf of 27 and 36.
Answer:
The transformation that occurs from 
is compression by 3 units horizontally and shift of 4 units upwards.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Translation Rules:
If 
the function is compressed 
units horizontally.
If 
and 
the function stretches units horizontally.
If the function shifts units to the up.
If 
the function shifts units to the down.
Applying the rules to 
Step 1
[compressed 
units horizontally]
Step 2
∴
[shifts 4 nits up]
∴ The transformation that occurs from is compression by 3 units horizontally and shift of 4 units upwards.
Actually its false
In algebra 4x and 4x² are two different terms and are not like terms.
Must click thanks and mark brainliest
Answer:
b. Hannah is likely to be incorrect because 9 is not contained in the interval.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
Hannah estimated per CI the difference between the average time that people spend outside in southern states and the average time people spend outside in northern states.
The CI is a method of estimation of population parameters that propose a range of possible values for them. The confidence level you use to construct the interval can be interpreted as, if you were to calculate 100 confidence interval, you'd expect that 99 of them will contain the true value of the parameter of interest.
In this example, the 99%CI resulted [0.4;8.0]hs
Meaning that with a 99% confidence level you'd expect the value of the difference between the average time people from southern states spend outside than the average time people from northern states spend outside is included in the interval [0.4;8.0]hs.
Now, she claims that people living in southern states spend 9 more hours outside than people living in northern states, symbolized μ₁ - μ₂ > 9
Keep in mind that if you were to test her claim, the resulting hypothesis test would be one-tailed
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ ≤ 9
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ > 9
And that the calculated Ci is tow-tailed, so it is not valid to use it to decide over the hypotheses pair. This said, considering that the calculated interval doesn't contain 9, it is most likely that Hannah's claim is incorrect.
I hope this helps!
Divide the top number by the bottom number, then move decimal point to the right two spots .
