Since there are no fixed costs in the long run, choice (c) is the correct one.
<h3>What is implicit cost?</h3>
You make the decision to forgo receiving a salary during the first two years in order to assist cover starting costs. Any expense that has already happened but isn't always shown or reported as a separate charge is considered an implicit cost. It stands for an opportunity cost that develops when a business commits internal resources to a project without receiving any direct payment in exchange. In the field of economics, an implicit cost, also known as an imputed cost, implied cost, or notional cost, is the opportunity cost corresponding to what a company must forgo in order to employ a factor of production that it already owns and is therefore not subject to rental fees. In contrast, an explicit expense is one that is paid for up front.
<h3>Which is not an implicit cost?</h3>
Employee salaries serve as a direct variable cost that is dependent on the level of production; as such, they are an accounting expense rather than an implicit one.
To know more about Implicit Cost visit:
brainly.com/question/15849018
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Land and other real estate held as investments by endowments in a government’s permanent fund should be reported at
Group of answer choices
A. Historical cost.
B. Fair value less costs of disposal.
C. Fair value.
D. The lower of cost and net realizable value.
Answer:
C. Fair value.
Explanation:
Land and other real estate held as investments by endowments in a government's permanent fund should be reported at fair value of the reporting date except for the exception of life insurance contract, external investment pool, money market investment etc.
The fair value can be defined as the actual or real value of an asset, security, product or item in financial accounting.
Answer: ($203)
Explanation:
The company’s 2010 change in net working capital will be calculated thus:
Net working capital = current assets - current liabilities
For 2009, net working capital will be:
= $2,584 - $1,191
= $1393.
For 2010, net working capital will be:
= $2,644 - $1,048
= $1596
Change in net working capital will be:
= $1393 - $1596
= ($203)
Answer and Explanation:
As we know that the credit amount should be allowed a qualified deduction of 100% till $2,000 and the next 25% is $2,000
In the given situation, the credit amount would be
= $1,600 × 100%
= $1,600
As the AGI is $175,000 i.e. exceeded the prescribed amount i.e. $160,000 so it would be phased out till $180,000
So, after considering the phase out application limits, the credit is
= $1,600 × ($180,000 - $175,000) ÷ ($180,000 - $160,000)
= $400
So, the total credit is $400 out of which $160 is refundable and the remaining balance i.e. $240 would be non-refundable
Answer:
This distribution is not taxable since Raoul is not earning any money at all (dividend income = $0), but the tax basis on the stocks that he holds will vary.
Before the distribution, Raoul had 310 shares, each share with a $60 tax basis. After the distribution, Raoul will have 465 shares, each share with a $40 tax basis.
