Answer:
The Best 5 Reasons For Businesses to Extend Credit
Additional Cash Flow. If customers can put off payment without consequences, they will. ...
Additional Sales
Additional sales will come in the form of customers spending more money on your products and services. ...
Higher Customer Loyalty. ...
Leverage During Negotiations. ...
Simple Technique For Extending Credit.
When selling on credit, there is a chance that the customer may go bankrupt and fail to pay you. The company will lose revenue. The company will also have to write off the debt as bad debt
hope it helps you
mark me as brainliest dude!!
Answer:
<u><em>(It seems that the amount in question is wrongly typed as 65,000 instead of 65,000,000)</em></u>
The correct answer is $40,000.000.
Explanation:
The answer is calculated from guidlines provided in IFRS 10.
As per accounting standards the price paid above fair value of net asset is taken as goodwill. Goodwill is accounted as asset in balance sheet.
As fair value is not given we will assume that book values are equal to fair value. The detail calculations are given below.
Consideration paid $ 65,000,000
FV of net asset ($ 25,000,000)
Goodwill $ 40,000,000
Answer:
false
Explanation:
my teacher said it was false but she could be wrong
Answer: charge a monopoly price
Explanation:
Patents provide an exclusive right to the firm in the production and sale of a drug. This provides the firm exclusive market power to decide the price and the quantity and therefore the firm is able to charge a monopoly price and also earn monopoly profits.
When an existing patent expires and the generic producers enter the market, the price reduces due to an increase in the supply of the erstwhile patented drug. This will reduce the monopoly profit of incumbent producers. Therefore, they will seek to deter the entry of generic drug makers in order to safeguard their monopoly profits and price.
Therefore, incumbents were willing to give enough to potential entrants so as to make them delay entry to charge a monopoly price.
The effect of the 2013 Supreme Court decision allowing legal action against these companies is increase in the cost of pay-for-delay agreements and also reduce incumbent profits from these agreements.