1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
6

Which of these resulted from the holocaust?

History
1 answer:
anygoal [31]3 years ago
6 0
B. Reunification of Germany, even thought the holocuast was terrible, it did have a good out come of bringing together germany (even if it was for a terrible cause)
You might be interested in
in the debate over the ratification of the U.S. constitution ,which point would have been made by a federalist
aleksklad [387]
In the debate over the ratification of the U.S constitution, a Federalist would have argued that the Articles of Confederation were far too weak, and needed to be replaced with a stronger document.

3 0
3 years ago
What best represents a nativist attitude toward the influx of immigrants around 1900
Ludmilka [50]
<span>Immigrants will work for low wages and break strikes, thereby hurting all American workers.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
How did the King of Siam react to European imperialism??
victus00 [196]
He educated himself and his people and negotiated to maintain independence
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Difficulties faced by people as they expanded their countries prior to the advent of modern technology.
butalik [34]

Answer:

that was the question or where the example

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP MEEEEE
Dmitry [639]

Answer:

This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • what was the result of delegates from the Democratic Party not being able to nominate a candidate in 1860
    12·1 answer
  • 90% of the people of south america practice Christianity
    6·1 answer
  • Which captain of industry is known for believing that it was the responsibility of the wealthy to be charitable?
    13·2 answers
  • A consequence of trade along the eastern Mediterranean was not simply economic growth and political clout, but also the exchange
    15·2 answers
  • What did the plantation economy that developed in the South need in order to
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Diocletian divide the Roman Empire into eastern and western sections in 285 A.D.? A) There were religious differences be
    5·1 answer
  • Write a one page document on your opinion, what were the two most important inventions during Industrialization Era/Gilded Age?
    8·1 answer
  • What were the benefits of purchasing Alaska? Select three options:
    6·2 answers
  • Please help! 10 Pts <br><br> I will mark brainiest!
    12·1 answer
  • Question 1 of 5
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!