Historians affect history because the bias of historians will affect the way that they record events.
Whether intentional or unintentional, many historians include bias in their writing when recording events. Bias is your personal beliefs or attitudes skewed for or against a topic that influence your writing. If a historian includes this in their writing about an event, it can change the way that the event is perceived by the public. Many historians relay the facts in a similar manner, but it is the bias that makes their stories unique from one another and also how they affect history.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
explanation below
Explanation:
Why did the British set their sites on Baltimore for attack? Because it was one of America’s major seaports Because it was the capitol of Maryland Because President Madison moved there after the White House was burned down
I'm not sure if any were begun in 1775. The American Revolution was occurring at the time but it started in 1760's the sugar and stamp acts were in 1764 and 1765, While the Townsend act was in 1770. The declaration wasn't even started until 1817.
Answer:
1 boston massacre.
2 boston tea party
3 intolerable acts
4 sons of liberty
5 taxation without representation
6 stamp act
Answer: Yeoman farmers
Explanation: Jefferson and the form of democracy he aimed to popularize, supported yeoman farmers and was against the other options listed in this question, the factory worker, merchant and banker.
The new republic represented freedom from corruption, aristocracy and British rule and the yeoman farmer was a perfect example of people who were not touched by any of these as they simply relied on the land and their farm yield. Jefferson therefore believed that they represented the virtue and wholesomeness of the new republic.
