Answer:
June 31st 1859 , I was helping some slaves make it up north to newyork when we were stopped by a slave catcher. My lungs longed for air as i hoped he moved along so I can see my son in Newyork. We made it to Kentucky where i was informed that the slaves i had helped escape last month were caught and tooken back to the plantation and beaten. I work on a plantation Here in Kentucky and I feed the slaves good
fresh food in plantations all over and I haven't been caught Yet.
Hope this helps !
Explanation:
The happenings at the second half of the 20th century paved way for a new conservatism movement. The American people at that time thought that "liberalism had gone too far" which could mainly be attributed to the rise of the civil rights movement and the course of the Cold War.
The Indian and Pakistani conflict over Kashmir has become a cause for international concern due to the achievements of both nations in the area of nuclear weaponry, whereas both countries were able to successfully conduct nuclear tests in 1998, making both of them a threat to a greater public due to the massive destruction a nuclear war could bring.
North and West. USA and Russia. Let me know if that's correct.
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
