The Legislative Branch is the branch of government with the most power. The point of Checks and Balances is to ensure that not one branch is stronger than another. It’s the basic balance of government you can say. The Legislative branch which consists of Congress can do things like Declare War, Make Laws, Impeachment, etc. Making them the most powerful branch in U.S Government.
Answer:
concurring
Explanation:
a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.
Nationwide females and African-Americans are the most frequent targets of corporal punishment in schools.
<h3 /><h3>What is Punishment?</h3>
Punishment is the response for some wrong doing. In a school punishments are common when pupil makes severe mistakes, pupil are warned and if they repeat the mistake.
Corporal punishment is the punishment in which the punished is hurt physically, this is generally not allowed in schools, but if this happens the most frequent target are females and African-Americans.
Teachers should not be allowed for this as this type of punishment demotivates the student.
Learn more about Punishment at brainly.com/question/27295567
#SPJ1
Answer:
Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.
Explanation:
Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.