1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fittoniya [83]
2 years ago
9

Discuss the role of judicial review in relation to administrative agencies.

Law
1 answer:
KATRIN_1 [288]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: First, courts will examine the statutory authority for an agency's action and will invalidate agency choices that exceed these limits. In addition, a court may examine an agency's discretionary decisions, or discrete actions with legal consequences for the public.

You might be interested in
Which of the following are consistent with Contractionary Fiscal Policy
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

Lower Government Spending

Raise Taxes

6 0
3 years ago
URGENT 40 POINTS
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

The best awnser is D

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Those who opposed the constitution feared the national government would
MissTica
Supporters of the new Constitution, known as the Federalists, included such prominent figures as George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison. Their chief concern was strengthening the national government in order to promote unity and stability.
6 0
3 years ago
Before a sport manager is liable for negligence, the plaintiff must show that the sport manager owed the plaintiff a duty of car
morpeh [17]

Answer:

D: All of the above

Explanation:

Before a sport manager is liable for negligence, the plaintiff must show that the sport manager owed the plaintiff a duty of care. A legal duty of care arises from a relationship inherent in a particular situation, a voluntary assumption of the duty of care, and a duty mandated by a law.

5 0
3 years ago
The LDF attorneys hoped that the arguments set forth in the Boykin v. Alabama brief would eventually become the basis for the de
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna

Explanation:

In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.

By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who suggested that a person’s physical characteristics could predict whether they were a criminal or not?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following powers of the president does NOT require the consent of
    6·2 answers
  • Michael Manin, an airline pilot, was twice convicted of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor. To renew his flight certificati
    15·1 answer
  • How long is a representative's term of office?
    7·2 answers
  • Which is not a example of slander per se?a. A written poster hanging in the school cafeteria, which stated that, the principal s
    5·1 answer
  • Jay is fired from his job and sues his employer. Jay loses the trial, and he appeals. The reviewing court affirms the decision o
    6·1 answer
  • Me and my brother looked up why do we need to learn all these subjects but like we looked them up one by one and almost all of t
    13·1 answer
  • URGENT PLEASE HELP! LAW QUESTION
    14·1 answer
  • Write a couple of paragraph about an interesting dream that you have had​
    11·1 answer
  • What characteristics of the truffle trees make then a good example of a renewable natural resource that could easily become a no
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!