This is a opinion based answer but there is 3 main answers to this question one is yes they should be able to take their rights away because us having the freedom to do anything can be dangerous for the government second is no they shouldn’t just because we are going into war doesn’t give them the rights to take our freedoms away because it could cause more problems within the way and the third is no they shouldn’t be able too unless their given a valid reason to take their right and then give an example
Answer:
Free speech was limited in 1919 after a decision was reached about the Supreme Court case, Schenck v. United States. The court determined that free speech would not be permitted when it presented a "clear and present danger" to society.
Explanation:
Answer:
Answer:
Arizona
Explanation:
A popular Mexican American studies program was banned by the state of Airzona, which accused it of causing resentment of white people.
Explanation:
Basically their goal was to defend the nations members from threats from the communist enemies/countries.
Like for example, France and the US would be in the United Nations/NATO and Russia and China would be the communists.
NATO is the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance between North America and Europe.
Answer:
In government, a dictator is a ruler who has total control over a country, with no checks or balances to prevent abuse of power. Dictator can also describe someone who acts like that on a smaller scale. When your sister is getting married and your mom makes her order roses instead lilies for the table arrangements and yells at you for addressing the invitations too slowly and insists that all of her coworkers be invited, she’s acting like a dictator.
Explanation: