Answer:
A. have negative effects on the environment
Explanation:
Although mining is important for the country's economy, the environmental impacts of mining are diverse, ranging from specific local problems to large biological, geomorphological, water and atmospheric changes. Therefore, to know these caused problems and the minimization of their effects is of great necessity to guarantee the preservation of the natural environments.
Extraction of wood also has a negative impact on nature, with the greatest impact being deforestation. The first consequence of deforestation is the impairment of biodiversity, because of the decrease or even the extinction of plant and animal species. Tropical forests have enormous biodiversity and are therefore priceless. Many species, which are still unknown to the urban-industrial society, may be the cure for diseases and can be used in food or as raw materials. With deforestation, there is a risk that these species will be destroyed before being discovered and studied. In addition, the desmatamente destroys the home of many wild animals that end up going to the urban centers and could cause some inconvenience to the population.
The parts of criminal trials that has not been part of selective incorporation
is the the right to a jury composed from the area where the crime was
committed .
The criminal trials have experienced some amendments over the years such as the right to a speedy and public trial.
The right to a jury composed from the area where the crime was committed
hasn't however been fully incorporated as the main aim of a trial is to secure
an accurate conviction.
Read more on brainly.com/question/25260121
Answer:
Loyalists were American colonists who stayed loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolutionary War, often called Tories, Royalists, or King's Men at the time. They were opposed by the "Patriots", who supported the revolution, and called them "persons inimical to the liberties of America".[1] Prominent Loyalists repeatedly assured the British government that many thousands of them would spring to arms and fight for the crown. The British government acted in expectation of that, especially in the southern campaigns in 1780–81. In practice, the number of Loyalists in military service was far lower than expected since Britain could not effectively protect them except in those areas where Britain had military control. The British were often suspicious of them, not knowing whom they could fully trust in such a conflicted situation; they were often looked down upon.[2] Patriots watched suspected Loyalists very closely and would not tolerate any organized Loyalist opposition. Many outspoken or militarily active Loyalists were forced to flee, especially to their stronghold of New York City. William Franklin, the royal governor of New Jersey and son of Patriot leader Benjamin Franklin, became the leader of the Loyalists after his release from a Patriot prison in 1778. He worked to build Loyalist military units to fight in the war, but the number of volunteers was much fewer than London expected.
When their cause was defeated, about 15 percent of the Loyalists (65,000–70,000 people) fled to other parts of the British Empire, to Britain itself, or to British North America (now Canada). The southern Loyalists moved mostly to Florida, which had remained loyal to the Crown, and to British Caribbean possessions, often bringing along their slaves. Northern Loyalists largely migrated to Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. They called themselves United Empire Loyalists. Most were compensated with Canadian land or British cash distributed through formal claims procedures. Loyalists who left the US received £3 million[citation needed] or about 37 percent of their losses from the British government. Loyalists who stayed in the US were generally able to retain their property and become American citizens.[3] Historians have estimated that between 15 and 20 percent of the two million whites in the colonies in 1775 were Loyalists (300,000–400,000).[4]
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
they disliked leadership within the indians
The EIC arrived as traders and eventually took over the entire subcontinent . Indians had plenty of reasons to dislike the british
1.The simla deputation favored Muslims
2. They were Heavily Persecuted after the war of 1857
BTW plz mention specific year
Most of them were farmers.
