No I think if I remember
Before the Americans officially declared independence, the British were worried about what King George’s response to the unrest there would be. After all, the Declaration of Independence was not the beginning of the American Revolution; the riot-provoking Stamp Act was passed in 1765,
Hello there.
<span>How did william penn impact self-government in america?
</span>He did<span> not think the colonists should have full power.</span>
Answer: Brutus is more naive, while Cassius is manipulative and deceitful.
Explanation:
Shakespeare's <em>Julius Caesar </em>portrays the moral dilemma of Brutus, Caesar's friend. He makes a decision to participate in a conspiracy to murder Caesar, led by Cassius.
Cassius and Brutus differ in that Cassius is cunning and corrupt, while Brutus is naive. Although both of them plot to kill Caesar, Cassius turns out to be more treacherous than Brutus. Brutus first hesitates to join the plot, but eventually joins because of his naivety. Cassius is, on the other hand, the one who initiates the murder plot, and is a quite manipulative character.
Based on the statement, it could mean that the writer of the
one who made the statement does not think that political parties have the
chances of winning and in the same time, they are likely to cause more harm
than to cause something good.
