1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Julli [10]
3 years ago
9

What has gone under years of scrutiny and are rarely discarded but can be modified with new research or data?

History
1 answer:
Andre45 [30]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Under years of scrutiny and are rarely discarded but can be modified with new research or data is explained below in details.

Explanation:

If a theory cannot describe new indication or remarks then the theory is developed or even thrown out, buat if the opinion still describes a broad variety of investigations and proof then it is updated rather than rejected.

As further scientific testimony is collected, a scientific approach may be changed and eventually rejected if it cannot be adjusted to match the new conclusions; in such circumstances, a more fundamental theory is then required.

You might be interested in
Choose the sentence in which the non-restrictive phrase appears in bold.
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure It's A! :D

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Southern states believe they had the right to secede from the
Readme [11.4K]
It would be c) or d) hope this helps
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.

The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.

5 0
2 years ago
What is the purpose of debates in federal legislative process?
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

What is the purpose of debates in the federal legislative process? To allow supporters and opponents of a bill to state their cases. Congress forms a conference committee in order to: Eliminate differences between House and Senate versions of a bill.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
A group of people lives in a chaotic country that has been devastated by war. There is no government or law enforcement, so peop
antiseptic1488 [7]
C. Hobbes's theory of social contract.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does Commissioner Lin describe British merchants
    5·1 answer
  • The concept of empiricism states that all rationally knowledge is determined from experience. Francis Bacon was one of the first
    6·1 answer
  • When did the ancient greeks live?
    8·1 answer
  • One right that has been taken away due to british actions or policies
    7·1 answer
  • What is the best description of the "Great Compromise"?
    15·1 answer
  • does anyone have a course hero premium account because i found what i need but it is blurred please help me i really need it asa
    14·2 answers
  • Please help me ASAP PLEASE
    6·1 answer
  • Question 2 (1 point)
    7·1 answer
  • Cierto o falso porf
    5·1 answer
  • Paraphrased this Question<br><br> What are some problems our society faces?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!