<h3><u>Factors considered by Roosewelt in shaping America’s strategy for global conflict:</u></h3>
President Franklin D. Roosevelt considered the importance of United States in the world and its critical role to play in global development while shaping the America's strategy for global conflict.
1. The President had believed the America has a very critical role to perform globally.
2. He took care of the foreign affairs policies of the nation but he also came up with his own deals for speeding up the development process.
3. His main aim was to bring the nation and its people back on the track of progress from the serious depressing phase.
4. He took the issue of home grown economy very seriously and focused on its development.
5. He worked with other big powers globally to stabilize the international economy.
6. He gets the title of most favored nation for the United States and get the trading agreements with other countries to increase the economic state of the America.
7. He established the greatest foreign policy of “good neighbor” toward other western countries and grab their supports as well.
Francisco de Xeres, secretary to Conquistador Pizarro, 1547
Historians affect history because the bias of historians will affect the way that they record events.
Whether intentional or unintentional, many historians include bias in their writing when recording events. Bias is your personal beliefs or attitudes skewed for or against a topic that influence your writing. If a historian includes this in their writing about an event, it can change the way that the event is perceived by the public. Many historians relay the facts in a similar manner, but it is the bias that makes their stories unique from one another and also how they affect history.
Hope this helps!
It would be the second one and are you with the k12 progam?
Answer: The history of the Electoral College is receiving a lot of attention. Pieces like this one, which explores “the electoral college and its racist roots,” remind us how deeply race is woven into the very fabric of our government. A deeper examination, however, reveals an important distinction between the political interests of slaveholders and the broader category of the thing we call “race.”
“Race” was indeed a critical factor in the establishment of the Constitution. At the time of the founding, slavery was legal in every state in the Union. People of African descent were as important in building northern cities such as New York as they were in producing the cash crops on which the southern economy depended. So we should make no mistake about the pervasive role of race in the conflicts and compromises that went into the drafting of the Constitution.
Yet, the political conflicts surrounding race at the time of the founding had little to do with debating African-descended peoples’ claim to humanity, let alone equality. It is true that many of the Founders worried about the persistence of slavery in a nation supposedly dedicated to universal human liberty. After all, it was difficult to argue that natural rights justified treason against a king without acknowledging slaves’ even stronger claim to freedom. Thomas Jefferson himself famously worried that in the event of slave rebellion, a just deity would side with the enslaved.
Explanation:
