1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
2 years ago
9

1) Do you agree or disagree with how the colonists reacted to British laws? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
Paha777 [63]2 years ago
5 0
I agree with how the colonists reacted to British laws,because the British laws were un-just.They taxed the colonists without asking them for permission,they forced them to quarter British Soldiers in their home along with the stamp act and tea act.
You might be interested in
What brought the first people to the area of Oklahoma?
vladimir1956 [14]
Nutrient-rich soil for farming

If you remember, a lot of Okies went to California during the Depression because they had "ruined" the land to the point they couldn't use it anymore
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Middle Ages refers to a period of time between the 500s and the 1500s <br> T or F
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

476 AD - 1453

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which idea would william Graham Sumner most likely support?
balu736 [363]
Good Morning!

Graham Sumner is known for his tendencies to defend extreme freedom. Socialism prevents this perspective because it plans the economy. Manifest destiny prevents this perspective because it defends a kind of determinism and the Gospel of Wealth ends up falling into the same mistakes. Sumner would be closer to the idea of "Laissez-faire," since he is also known as a type of libertarian and would therefore defend the free market.

hugs!
5 0
2 years ago
Which leader declared that “the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans?”
Arada [10]

Answer:

Martin luther king

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Worlld war 1 and world war 2 were both concentrated in
    5·1 answer
  • Which explains a difference between deng xiaoping and mao zedong in regards to economic policy? deng sought to modernize china b
    8·2 answers
  • The region of the country that experienced the greatest population growth during the Great Depression was
    6·1 answer
  • What famous novelist came from Deep Deuce? Ralph Ellison Will Rogers Roscoe Dunjee Jimmy Rushing
    11·1 answer
  • Alexander the Great ruled much like his father, cautiously and patiently. True False
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the Byzantine Empire important to world societies today? Provide specific examples of the political, social, economic, t
    12·1 answer
  • Most of New Zealand has what type of climate?
    6·1 answer
  • _____ abortions occur when a woman willingly chooses to terminate her pregnancy.
    6·2 answers
  • 3) Do the other documents support this conclusion? Why or why not?
    15·1 answer
  • What role do political parties play in committees?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!