B. The decision affirmed the protection of symbolic speech.
In Schneck v. the United States (1919), the Court's resolution supported the limitation of symbolic speech in the form of anti-war brochures which inspired residents to resist the draft. In two following cases, Thornhill v. Alabama (1940) and Virginia v. Barnette (1943), the Court ordered in favor of First Amendment security for symbolic speech. By favouring the students, the Supreme Court guaranteed that the students had the right to free speech inside schools as long as it did not disturb the education process.
Answer:
Among the European immigrants and their descendants, pioneer farmers settling the grasslands of the American West often built houses of sod, while early settlers of the eastern forest built wooden structures like log cabins. This suggests that building materials <u><em>are strongly influenced by local resources</em></u>.
Explanation:
When the European settlers first came to the American colony, they build their settlements based on the availability of local resources. This means that they would build their houses/ huts with whatever materials they could get their hands on, and not based on what they want.
While the farmers settling in the grasslands of the American West built houses made of sod, the ones in the east would use logs to build their houses. This shows that the availability of resources determines the type of houses or settlements built.
Thus, the correct answer is the last/ fifth option.
Base on the question where as asking to state the term that described the official political party of the Mexican revolution, and in my further research and analysis, I would say that the official political party is a Revolutionary Party. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have more questions
Answer:
P- The classroom teacher is crucial to the development and academic success of the average student, and administrators simply are ancillary to this effort.
C- Classroom teachers ought to be paid at least the equivalent of administrators at all levels, including the superintendent
Explanation:
The premise of an argument is the theory,idea, truth or principle on which the conclusion is based.
From the example we believe we believe is crucial to the success of the student and so(conclusion) must be rewarded appropriately like the administrators. An argument can have more than one premise.