Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
Answer:Your Answer Is A
Explanation:It would help calculate which program would show the highest overall benefits and lowest overall costs.
C and D are likely correct.
High interest rates would likely dissuade people from using credit cards and would likely move them back to using their debit cards for purchases and to keep credit card purchases to ones that they knew they could pay back. You would end up getting people who were more desperate for the line of credit using it.
The goverment has less spending money so basically the banks have more spending money and when banks make loans they end up having a lot more spending power then the whole goverment
The tendency of people to use the group as a means of understanding who they are, and how they fit into society.
