Answer:
B). Its results are not generally applicable.
Explanation:
A case study is described as the research plan or an experimental investigation that primarily intends to observe or examine a phenomenon, individual, or a group(as representatives) within its authentic context to make generalized deductions or conclusions.
As per the question, option B best describes the outcomes of a case study. The description of 'its results are not generally applicable' reflects that the research could not lead to producing a generalized conclusion that can represent the other associated units intensively. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
If the results of a experiment do not support the hypothesis this does not necessarily mean that the experiment was a failure or that the hypothesis was wrong, but simply that the test that was conducted did not find results that were significant and also showed that the "null hypothesis" was incorrect. Therefore, if a hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate by a particular experiment the issue might need further experimentation because it could be wrong or it could not, but this does not mean the experiment was a failure. In fact proving a hypothesis can be informative for conducting further experiments to conclude what caused the phenomena if not the original hypothesis.
Answer: The answer is D
D because they had many scarce materials so they had to shift the process to war needs.
Answer:
Tell the manager and he will direct the complaint to the employees about the type of issue the customer has
Explanation:
According to the rules, you cannot do anything except for saying: "I am sorry about that, ma'am/sir. If you have any complaints, you can go to the customer service and they will take action immediately"
And then you just need tow wait for the consequences, like, for example, the manager can talk to all of you, warn, and can also terminate. Sad story with terminating, but usually you will end p receiving a lower paycheck
Paragraph:
"take a stand and tell what you think has been the most important change to the citizenship laws in the United States. Why did you choose this?"
After studying this timeline, I have several mixed emotions towards all the changes and extents in which some of these citizenship laws have targeted. Though there is much to uncover here, truly there is only one that I feel is the most important, beneficial, and altering change that has occurred. In 1952, the U.S congress made a change to their laws, stating that "citizenship cannot be denied because of race or gender." This has been one of our nation's greatest decisions and I'm sure that many people can agree it was very necessary for our thriving population. This law ensures that a person's citizenship cannot be disregarded in terms of race or gender, giving everyone their full potential in our society.
You can edit this and what not I hope this helps and it wasn't sent in too late!
