Answer:
B) The excitement of the accident and the speedy response of the rescuer would be considered in a case such as this.
Explanation:
D) is incorrect; the driver would have a defense if he could demonstrate that the rescuer's actions were reckless.
(A) is incorrect because, while the court can conclude that the rescuer recklessly put himself in danger, this is not an absolute defense.
(C) is an incorrect statement of law; assumption of risk may be applicable, depending on the circumstances, such as if the rescue were reckless.
Answer:
The Rules Committee decides whether the debate can take place.
No Spain wasn't first to have slaves it was Europe who had the first slave's Hope this helps:)
The proper answer in your case is D ok by
Answer: Amicus curiae
Explanation: Amicus curiae is the person who provides case related information, guidance,expertise,interest in that field etc to the court which can help and impact the case in influential manner.
Amicus curiae is not the person that belongs or is part of case rather provides information as external factor working for the court.He/she is also remarked as "friend of the court"
