Answer:
The correct answer is D. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the short run; however, a tax-rate reduction will increase the automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable.
Explanation:
Ricardian Equivalence is an economic theory that suggests that when a government increases expenses financed with debt to try to stimulate demand, demand does not really undergo any change.
This is because increases in the public deficit will lead to higher taxes in the future. To keep their consumption pattern stable, taxpayers will reduce consumption and increase their savings in order to offset the cost of this future tax increase.
If taxpayers reduce their consumption and increase their savings by the same amount as the debt to be returned by the government, there is no effect on aggregate demand.
The fundamental concept of Ricardian equivalence is that it does not matter which method the government chooses to increase spending, whether by issuing public debt or through taxes (applying an expansive fiscal policy), the result will be the same and demand will remain unchanged.
Answer:
b. the creation of different meanings based on social and cultural context.
Explanation:
According to my research, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this provides an example of the subjectivity of the interpretation process. This basically means that the creation of someones judgement is based on personal opinions from social and cultural context. Therefore it can be said that the answer to this question would be b. the creation of different meanings based on social and cultural context.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
C. III only
Explanation:
Option III states An investment in stock that Misk does not intend to sell in the near future. Which of above securities purchased by Misk should be classified as available-for-sale securities?
The choice of this option alone is based on the reasoning that Available for Sale (AFS) Securities are usually presented based on their fair values. As such an increase in investment will be needed when the Fair value exceeds is more than the cost of the securities.
The other effect of the transaction of Misk Co is that it will lead to an increase in other comprehensive income.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The reason is that the opening inventory value of year 2 is the closing amount of the year 1. Its similar to the closing cash amount left in till at the end of year 1 is the opening amount at the year 2. So the opening inventory of year 2 is closing inventory of year 1. This means the closing inventory of year 1 has decreased by $10,000.
As we know that:
Cost of goods sold = Op. Inventory + Purchases - Cl. Inventory
This means if the closing amount increases the cost of goods decreases and in the given scenario the closing inventory of year 1 has been decreased which means that the cost of goods sold has increased which will decrease the profit. And if the profit decreases then:
Earning per share = Profit after tax (Decreased) / Number of share (Same)
As the profit has decreased the earning per share will also decrease.
